|
CONSUMER NEWS RECALLS COMPLAINT FORM SCAM ALERTS |
| Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish | |
|
|
![]() |
Major Weight-Loss Marketers Pay $3 Million |
|||||
|
May 11, 2006
The settlement bars unsubstantiated claims in the future and bars the marketers from misrepresenting studies or endorsements. According to the FTC’s complaint, the ads for three skin gels – Tummy Flattening Gel, Cutting Gel, and Dermalin APg – claimed they melted away fat wherever applied, including a user’s thighs, tummy, even a double chin. Ads for Leptoprin and Anorex, two ephedrine pills, claimed they caused weight loss of more than 20 pounds. The advertising for PediaLean fiber pills for overweight children claimed the pills caused substantial weight loss. The FTC charged the marketers lacked a reasonable basis to back up these claims. In addition, the FTC alleged the ads falsely claimed that clinical testing proved those claims for four of the challenged products and misrepresented their spokesperson as a medical doctor. Ads for the products ran on television, in magazines, and in tabloids. The products were also marketed on the Internet. Leptoprin was heavily advertised through short-form television infomercials. Ads for the skin gels ran in Cosmopolitan, Muscle and Fitness, and other magazines. PediaLean was advertised in tabloids and magazines such as The Enquirer and Redbook. Under the FTC’s final order, the primary company, Basic Research, will pay $3 million on behalf of all six companies and three individuals charged in this case: Basic Research, LLC, A.G. Waterhouse, LLC, Klein Becker USA, LLC, NutraSport, LLC, Sovage Dermalogic Laboratories, LLC, BAN LLC, Dennis Gay, Daniel B. Mowrey (also doing business as American Phytotherapy Research Laboratory) and Mitchell K. Friedlander. The FTC’s final order prohibits the marketers from making unsubstantiated claims that Dermalin-APg, Cutting Gel, Tummy Flattening Gel, Anorex, Leptoprin, PediaLean, or any substantially similar product causes weight loss or fat loss and misrepresenting the effects of a product through the use of product names or endorsements. When they make weight-loss or fat-loss claims for any products, they must rely on competent and reliable scientific evidence. The marketers must also have substantiation to support representations that any food, drug, or dietary supplement has an effect on any disease, on the structure or function of the human body, or other health or weight-loss benefits. They cannot misrepresent any test, study, or research, or the profession, expertise, training, education, experience, or qualifications of any endorser.Report Your Experience
|
|
||||
Advertisement
|
Home |
Complaint Form |
News |
Recalls |
FAQ |
|
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|