Complain about a product or service

Florida Seeks Nationwide Telephone Billing Probe

By Mark Huffman
ConsumerAffairs.com

May 23, 2006

Cramming • Wireless Carriers Agree To $1.5 Million Cramming Settlement • Illinois Files "Cramming" Suit Against California Firm • Florida Seeks to Outlaw Cramming • AT&T Settles Cramming Suit • Feds Settle with BSG/ZPDI/Billing Concepts • Verizon Signs Florida Anti-Cramming Agreement • Embarq Agreement Protects Florida Consumers from Cramming • Florida Company Agrees to Repay 'Cramming' Charges • Florida Files "Cramming" Suit • Congress, Feds Sleep While Cramming Charges Afflict Thousands • Florida Seeks Nationwide Telephone Billing Probe • Florida Opens "Cramming" Probe • Cramming Hits Consumers When They Least Expect It • Spitzer Wins Cramming Concessions from Verizon • Mobsters Charged in Cramming Scheme • FTC Opens Hotline for Epixtar Victims --- • ILD Telecommunications • Billing Concepts/ZPDI

Florida Attorney General Charlie Crist, who last week announced an investigation of telephone company billing practices, is now seeking to expand the probe nationword.

In a letter to his fellow Attorneys General, Crist said the placing unauthorized charges on consumers' bill – a practice known as "cramming," is a national problem requiring a national solution.

"Because there is reason to believe that this conduct crosses state lines and involves multiple telephone companies, I am requesting your participation in a multi-state task force that will be formed to jointly investigate this conduct," Crist wrote.

The state initiated the investigation following media reports of "cramming," targeted against Florida consumers.

A number of consumers complained that their phone bills contained $12.95 charges for a service called Email Discount Network, which purports to offer members a discount for Internet shopping done through the company's Web site.

The company operating Email Discount Network is based in Plantation, Florida.

"We have learned that customers of BellSouth, AT&T, SBC Communications, Quest and Verizon also discovered the unauthorized charges on their bills," Crist said.

"Under Florida law, telephone companies are responsible for third-party billers who place charges on their bills."

Congress' Contribution

The Telecommunications Act of 1996 requires local telephone companies to allow other service providers to charge customers on their local phone bills.

The idea was to open up telecommunications to competition, but in practice the provision of the law has been abused by some companies who have engaged in "cramming."

ILD Telecommunications is one of the nation's largest third-party billing companies, which acts as a broker for smaller companies who want to bill consumers through their local phone bills.

ILD has been the subject of repeated consumer complaints as they have passed along many of the unauthorized charges that consumers object to.

A spokesman for Crist tells ConsumerAffairs.com that the investigation, at this point, is not targeting any specific company or group of companies, but will look at the role local telephone providers, third-party billers and other service providers play in the growing problem of "cramming."

"At this point we're just looking at everyone and everything, to see how they all fit together," said spokesman John Sherer. "We're just trying to see the big picture."

Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.

Share		Follow us on Twitter.

Back to the top |