NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS   RESOURCES  
Small Claims Guide   Class Actions   Lemon Laws   FAQ   Newsletters  
Share


Complain about a product or service

Automotive    Education    Employment    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Insurance    Pets    Shopping    Travel     Print This     Email This    



NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

Consumers, Prosecutors Rejoice at Enron Verdicts





By Truman Lewis
ConsumerAffairs.com

May 26, 2006
Consumer representatives and prosecutors applauded the news that a federal jury in Houston had convicted former Enron Chief Executive Officers Kenneth L. Lay and Jeffrey K. Skilling on charges including conspiracy, securities fraud, wire fraud, and making false statements.

"The fact that former Enron executives Ken Lay and Jeffrey Skilling have been found guilty of conspiracy and fraud will be little comfort to the Enron employees whose jobs and retirement accounts evaporated with the company�s collapse, or to the shareholders, institutional investors and retirees who lost billions," said Public Citizen President Joan Claybrook.

"Nor will it cheer consumers in the West, who lived through an unnecessary and manufactured 'energy crisis' that stemmed from the freewheeling and corrupt energy trading system that Lay and Skilling helped create.

Claybrook said the convictions send an important message to corporate chieftains: "Don�t cook the books, or you could do hard time".

California Attorney General Bill Lockyer also hailed the jury's decision.

"Today's verdict brings the two individuals who led Enron one step closer to being held accountable for ripping off California consumers and businesses, destroying the pensions of hundreds of workers and their families, and defrauding investors on a massive scale," Lockyer said.

"But this case is not just about punishing Ken Lay and Jeff Skilling. Hopefully, this verdict sends a strong message to corporate America. Hopefully, it will help deter corporate crime, and nurture the fair dealing and honesty essential to the well-being of our economy," he said.

Lockyer, state agencies and utilities in July 2005 reached a $1.52 billion settlement with Enron to resolve allegations the firm engaged in large-scale market manipulation during the California Energy Crisis of 2000-01. Given the company�s bankruptcy, Lockyer estimates Enron ultimately will pay about $260 million.

The eight-woman, four-man jury returned its verdict today on its sixth day of deliberations, following 56 days of trial proceedings before U.S. District Judge Sim Lake.

Lay, 64, was convicted on all of the six counts with which he was charged: conspiracy, two counts of wire fraud and three counts of securities fraud. Skilling, 52, was convicted on 19 of the 28 counts pending against him: conspiracy, 12 counts of securities fraud, one count of insider trading, and five counts of making false statements to auditors. He was also acquitted of nine insider trading counts.

Sentencing for both defendants is scheduled for Sept. 11, 2006. They face years in prison and fines amounting to tens of millions of dollars.

"The message of today's verdict is simple: our criminal laws will be enforced just as vigorously against corporate executives as they will be against street criminals," said Deputy U.S. Attorney General Paul J. McNulty, chairman of the President's Corporate Fraud Task Force. "No one -- including the heads of Fortune 500 companies -- is above the law."

The convictions stem from a wide-ranging scheme that Lay, Skilling and other Enron executives engaged in at various times between at least 1999 and 2001, to deceive the investing public, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and others about the true performance of Enron's businesses.

The scheme was designed to make it appear that Enron was growing at a healthy and predictable rate, consistent with analysts' published expectations, that Enron did not have significant write-offs or debt and was worthy of investment-grade credit rating, that Enron was comprised of a number of successful business units, and that the company had an appropriate cash flow.

It had the effect of inflating artificially Enron's stock price, which increased from approximately $30 per share in early 1998 to over $80 per share in January 2001, and artificially stemming the decline of the stock during the first three quarters of 2001.



Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.

Share

Follow us on Twitter.

FREE CONSUMER NEWSLETTERS

The Daily Consumer
Afternoons M-F

Sign up now!


Consumer News & Alerts
Every Sunday

Sign up now!





CONSUMER NEWS

SAFETY RECALLS

LATEST RATES

Back to the top |

Advertisement


Custom Search
AUTOMOTIVE
• Dealers
• Manufacturers
• Service
• Extended Warranties
• Lemon Laws
• Recalls
• Tires
• Transporters

FAMILY
• Aging
• Children, Parenting
• Recalls
• Dating
• Education
• Entertainment
• Pets
• Weddings
FINANCE
• Annuities
• Banks
• Credit Cards
• Debt Collection
• Debt Counseling
• Insurance
• Investing
• Loans
• Mortgages
• Payday Loans
• Student Loans
• Tax Prep

HEALTH
• Doctors
• Drugs, Pharmacies
• Health Clubs
• Hearing Care
• Hospitals
• Nursing Homes
• Nutrition, Diets
• Vision Care
• Weight Loss
HOUSE & HOME
• Appliances
• Cookware
• Furniture
• Home Improvements
• Lawn & Garden
• Movers
• Pools & Spas
• Realtors, Rental Agents
• Recalls
• Utilities

ELECTRONICS
• Cable TV/DBS
• Cameras
• Cell Phones
• Computers
• Home Electronics
• Internet Access
• Local Phone Service
• Long Distance
• VoIP
SHOPPING
• In-Home
• Online
• Retail Stores
• Sporting Goods
• Supermarkets
• Telemarketers

TRAVEL
• Airlines
• Bus Lines
• Car Rental
• Cruises
• Hotels
• Travel Agents
• Trains

RESOURCES
• Class Actions
• Complaint Form
• Small Claims Guide
• Lemon Laws
CONSUMER NEWS
• Latest News
• Automotive
• Telecom
• Financial
• Health
• Homeowners
• Scams
• Seniors
• Travel
• More ...

RECALLS
• Automotive
• Children's Products
• Drugs
• Food
• Household Products
• Sporting Goods

ABOUT US
• FAQ
• Privacy Policy
• Advertise With Us
• Newsroom
• Syndication
• Terms of Use

Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2009 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.    The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission.