CONSUMER NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS  


Complain about a product or service

Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish
Automotive    Education    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Shopping    Travel   
NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

Illinois Lawsuit Charges Data Brokerages Illegally Obtained and Sold Consumer Phone Records





April 20, 2006

Calling Records
FTC Shuts Down Pretexting Operation
Phone Pretexters Get Off Cheap
Verizon Wireless Changes Customer Data Policy
FCC Strengthens Rules For Phone Privacy
House Tries Once More to Pass Pretexting Bill
Pretexting Bill: Pretense or Reality?
Hewlett-Packard Pays $14.5 Million to Settle Pretexting Suit
HP Scandal Ignites New Pretexting Battle In Congress
AT&T Sues Calling Record Brokers
Sprint Nextel Settles Case with Florida Data Broker
Feds Sue Calling Record Vendors
Illinois Lawsuit Charges Data Brokerages
Florida Judgment to End Data Broker's Business
Florida Investigates Fake Caller IDs
California Sues Data Trace USA for $10 Million
Missouri Sues Datatraceusa.com
Florida Sues Data Broker Over Sale of Phone Records
Texas Sues Companies Selling Telephone Calling Records
Websites Hawking Phone Records Shut Down
FTC Vows to Stop Illicit Sale of Cell Phone Calling Records
FTC Pledges "Vigorous" Pursuit of Cell Phone Record Sales
AT&T Accused of Eavesdropping, Calling Record Sales
Sprint Sues Cell Phone Record Brokers
Missouri Shuts Down Locatecell.com
Texas Probes Cell Phone Calling Record Sales, Missouri Files Suit
Illinois Sues Company Selling Cell Phone Calling Records
Outcry Over Sale of Cell Phone Calling Records

Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan is suing two out-of-state companies, contending that they obtained and sold the phone records of consumers without their knowledge or consent. Both companies advertise their services using the Web site advsearch.com.

On their Web site, advsearch.com, the defendants advertise that for a fee they can obtain call records for any telephone number. The defendants charge $65 for landline call records, $125 for cellular outgoing calls and $145 for cellular incoming calls. For an additional $30 to $50, the defendants also will provide information regarding call times and duration of calls.

The lawsuit states that in order to access consumers' wireless and landline telephone records, the defendants' agents falsely represented themselves as account holders or as agents or employees of a cell phone company. Additionally, they allegedly tried to gain unauthorized computer access to records.

In January and March of this year, Madigan filed two lawsuits against other companies accusing them of using similar, illegal means to access phone records.

"Without the consent of account holders, these telephone data brokers allegedly invaded consumers' privacy and recklessly sold their private call logs in order to turn a profit," Madigan said.

The investigation into the defendants' practices began after the AG's Consumer Protection Division received a complaint. It revealed that on at least four occasions the defendants provided an Illinois investigation firm with phone records for Illinois consumers.

On one occasion, the Illinois investigation firm allegedly used Advance Research's services to obtain the telephone records for an Illinois resident. The records were obtained at the request of another Illinois resident who was contemplating legal action against the account holder. The account holder did not authorize the release of her cell phone records, Madigan's lawsuit states.

The defendants are charged with multiple violations of the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act.

The lawsuit asks the court to prohibit the defendants from advertising, offering for sale and selling telephone records or other private records and from further violating Illinois' consumer protection laws. It also seeks a civil penalty of $50,000 and additional penalties of $50,000 for each violation found to have been committed with the intent to defraud.

Finally, Madigan's lawsuit asks the court to order the defendants to pay for all costs for the investigation and prosecution of this case.

Named as defendants were Advanced Research, Inc., a New Jersey corporation, ARI-Advanced Research, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company, Rolf Michael Martin, president of Advanced Research, and Bruce T. Martin, vice president and general manager of Advanced Research and an officer of ARI-Advanced Research. The defendants are not licensed to do business in Illinois.



Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.


Consumer News

August 8 2008

Recent Recalls & Safety Alerts

Print, mail, etc.




FREE CONSUMER NEWSLETTERS

The Daily Consumer
Afternoons M-F

Sign up now!


Consumer News & Alerts
Every Sunday

Sign up now!


Knowledge is free.
Knowledge is power.



Back to the top |

Advertisement


Home | Rogues Gallery | Good Guys | Complaint Form | News | Recalls | Search | Video | FAQ |
Consumer Resources | Small Claims Guide | Lemon Law | Newsletter | Contact Us
Advertise With Us | Testimonials | Newsroom | RSS Feeds | Radio | Job Postings




Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.