|
|
NEWS
RECALLS
COMPLAINT FORM
SCAM ALERTS
RESOURCES
Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws FAQ Newsletters |
Share |
| Automotive Education Employment Electronics Family Finance Health Homeowners Insurance Pets Shopping Travel |
|
|
|
![]() |
Michigan Challenges Wal-Mart on Item Pricing |
|||||||||||||
|
March 2, 2006
The action follows an extensive investigation of Wal-Mart stores statewide in Michigan by investigators from the Attorney General's office, beginning in December of 2005. "Consumers in Michigan have a right to know the cost of an item when they go shopping," Cox said. "That means stores have a duty to follow the law and label prices on individual items. The results of my office's investigation are clear: Wal-Mart has failed to comply with Michigan's item pricing law on a massive scale." Five Wal-Mart stores were audited: Okemos, Howell, Roseville, Saginaw and Coldwater. The highest estimated compliance was found at the Okemos store (75%). The Saginaw store had an estimated compliance rate of 25%. The Roseville, Coldwater and Howell stores all had estimated compliance rates of 20%. "Marking prices on only 20 percent of items is shocking and inexcusable. And when multiple stores fail to comply with Michigan's item pricing law, it becomes more than just a store manager problem. It is a Wal-Mart problem," he said. "Michigan's law is clear: price items individually, so consumers can shop and compare. This legal action against Wal-Mart will improve their item pricing and cause other retailers to do the same," Cox added. The legal action is in the form of a Notice of Intended Action (NIA), a generally necessary step before a company can be sued by the Attorney General under the Consumer Protection Act. The NIA alleges violations of Michigan's Pricing and Advertising of Consumer Items Act, frequently referred to as the "Item Pricing Act," and Michigan's Consumer Protection Act. Wal-Mart has ten days to take substantial compliance efforts, or be sued. Any voluntary resolution will require the payment of a substantial civil penalty and reimbursement to the State for the cost of the investigation. The investigation is estimated to have cost at least $30,000.Report Your Experience
|
|||||||||||||
Back to the top | |
||||||||||||||
Advertisement
|
|
Custom Search
|
||||
|
AUTOMOTIVE Dealers Manufacturers Service Extended Warranties Lemon Laws Recalls Tires Transporters FAMILY Aging Children, Parenting Recalls Dating Education Entertainment Pets Weddings |
FINANCE Annuities Banks Credit Cards Debt Collection Debt Counseling Insurance Investing Loans Mortgages Payday Loans Student Loans Tax Prep HEALTH Doctors Drugs, Pharmacies Health Clubs Hearing Care Hospitals Nursing Homes Nutrition, Diets Vision Care Weight Loss |
HOUSE & HOME Appliances Cookware Furniture Home Improvements Lawn & Garden Movers Pools & Spas Realtors, Rental Agents Recalls Utilities ELECTRONICS Cable TV/DBS Cameras Cell Phones Computers Home Electronics Internet Access Local Phone Service Long Distance VoIP |
SHOPPING In-Home Online Retail Stores Sporting Goods Supermarkets Telemarketers TRAVEL Airlines Bus Lines Car Rental Cruises Hotels Travel Agents Trains RESOURCES Class Actions Complaint Form Small Claims Guide Lemon Laws |
CONSUMER NEWS Latest News Automotive Telecom Financial Health Homeowners Scams Seniors Travel More ... RECALLS Automotive Children's Products Drugs Food Household Products Sporting Goods ABOUT US FAQ Privacy Policy Advertise With Us Newsroom Syndication Terms of Use |
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2009 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|