CONSUMER NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS  


Complain about a product or service

Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish
Automotive    Education    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Shopping    Travel   
NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

FDA Finds High Mercury Levels in Some Canned Light Tuna





February 6, 2006

Mercury in Fish

High Mercury Levels Found In Sushi
Maternal Seafood Consumption Benefits Children's Development
Study: Benefits of Fish Outweigh the Risks
Tests Find Higher Mercury Content In Imported Tuna
Americans Confused about Mercury in Seafood, Survey Finds
Whole Foods Agrees to Post FDA's Mercury Warning
Americans Confused about Health Effects of Eating Fish
Mercury Levels Rising In Sport Fish
FDA Finds High Mercury Levels in Some Canned Light Tuna
Study: Moderate Fish Consumption Poses Mercury Risks
CSPI: Government Should Warn About Mercury in Fish
Whole Foods Pressed To Add Mercury Warnings
Warnings about Mercury in Fish May Do More Harm Than Good
Despite Contaminants, Fish Healthy for Most Men
Fish is Brain Food
FDA Urged to Crack Down on Tuna Mercury Levels
CA Restaurants Will Issue Fish Warnings
California Sues Tuna Canneries

The Food and Drug Administration has entered the debate over mercury levels in canned tuna, saying newly released data shows some cans of light tuna contain excessive levels of the toxic substance.

The FDA said its tests found that six percent of canned light tuna contained large amounts of mercury, which has been linked to learning disabilities in children and neurological problems in adults.

In the past the agency has recommended canned light tuna as a good choice for pregnant women and children.

The health agency also said it found high mercury levels in samples of Chilean sea bass, which is often sold in restaurants. Significant levels were also detected in big-eye tuna, which is sometime used to make sushi.

So far, the U.S. government has not issued officials warnings about the fish, even though the average mercury level detected in the tests was above the average in albacore tuna, about which the government has issued warnings, at least for pregnant women and young children.

The FDA tested more than 25 kinds of fish between 2001 and 2005. The agency said it delayed releasing its findings so scientists could complete an analysis.

High levels of mercury -- which accumulates in the environment, as well as in the flesh of fish and the bodies of those who eat fish -- have been shown to contribute to birth defects and other health problems, and several studies have demonstrated a subtle loss of mental acuity in the offspring of women who consume fish during pregnancy.

FDA and Environmental Protection Agency warnings issued in 2005 advise young children, pregnant women, nursing mothers and women of childbearing age to avoid consuming swordfish, king mackerel, shark and tilefish because of high mercury levels.

The warning also recommends that those groups eat no more than 12 ounces of fish weekly and eat no more than six ounces of canned albacore tuna weekly.

Tests Questioned

Some experts have questioned FDA's data-gathering process. According to the Chicago Tribune, FDA tested a mixture of samples from 12 cans of tuna during the study instead of testing individual cans.

"It would cost 12 times as much to test 12 separate cans and then average the data, which is what we would have to do," an unnamed FDA official said.

During the testing, one sample's mercury levels were recorded at 0.72 parts per million, which might indicate some of the samples in the mixture contained higher levels, according to the Tribune.

Jane Hightower, a San Francisco-based internist who treats patients with mercury-related conditions, called the process "incredibly disturbing," adding, "That is falsifying data as far as I am concerned," the Tribune reported.



Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.


Consumer News

September 5 2008

Recent Recalls & Safety Alerts



FREE CONSUMER NEWSLETTERS

The Daily Consumer
Afternoons M-F

Sign up now!


Consumer News & Alerts
Every Sunday

Sign up now!


Knowledge is free.
Knowledge is power.







Back to the top |

Advertisement


Home | Complaint Form | News | Recalls | FAQ |
Consumer Resources | Small Claims Guide | Lemon Law | Newsletter | Contact Us
Advertise With Us | Testimonials | Newsroom | RSS Feeds |


Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.    The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission.