CONSUMER NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS  


Complain about a product or service

Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish
Automotive    Education    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Shopping    Travel   
NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

FTC Sues Telemarketers for Do Not Call Violations





January 31, 2006

Do Not Call

North Carolina Asks Candidates to Respect 'Do Not Call' List
Congress Makes 'Do Not Call' List Permanent
FTC Vows Not To Purge Numbers from Do Not Call List
866 Calls Pushing Phony Health Insurance
FTC Sues Telemarketers for Do Not Call Violations
Telemarketers Must SendCaller ID Info
FCC Issues First Citation
AT&T Will Run DNC Database
AT&T Faces DNC Fine
DNC Registry Opens
Scam Artists Flock to DNC
Bush Signs DNC Bill

An automated phone dialing service hung up on more than 64 million people and called more than a million others whose numbers were listed on the National Do Not Call Registry, according to the Federal Trade Commission.

The FTC is seeking civil penalties and a permanent injunction against the company and its owners for violations of the FTC's Telemarketing Sales Rule (TSR).

"Telemarketers will pay a price for violating the Do Not Call Rule," said Lydia Parnes, Director of the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection. "They should also know they can't hang up or play a prerecorded message when someone answers the phone, even when they are calling on behalf of a nonprofit organization."

At the FTC's request, the U. S. Department of Justice has filed a complaint in federal court against The Broadcast Team (TBT), based in Ormond Beach, Florida, because of "voice broadcasting" messages that the company delivered on behalf of a variety of clients.

The complaint alleges that TBT can deliver more than a million prerecorded messages per day to answering machines and voice mail services and that, since October 1, 2003, it has received more than $2 million in revenue for telemarketing campaigns that violate the TSR.

The FTC charged that TBT unlawfully called DNC-listed numbers and made calls when the required annual fee for access to DNC-registered phone numbers had not been paid. The FTC also alleged that when calls were answered by people rather than answering machines or voice mail services, TBT ended the call immediately or hung up after playing a recording.

The TSR limits telemarketers' use of recorded messages by requiring that calls answered by a person be connected to a live representative within two seconds.

This restriction on "abandoning calls" by hanging up or playing a recording when someone answers applies to telemarketing calls to solicit sales of goods or services, and to calls from telefunders to solicit charitable contributions.

On behalf of debt management services-related companies, TBT caused more than 64 million calls to be abandoned, the complaint alleges. TBT also abandoned more than 250,000 calls in delivering recordings soliciting ticket sales, and more than 200,000 calls in delivering recordings soliciting charitable contributions, according to the complaint.

The complaint also alleges that, for more than three months, TBT called telephone numbers listed on the DNC Registry to deliver prerecorded solicitations for one of its clients, Debt Management Foundation Services (DMFS).

During part of this time, between January 15 and February 4, 2004, TBT called more than one million Registry-protected numbers. TBT also made calls for DMFS and other debt management services-related companies when the required annual fees for access to DNC-listed phone numbers were not paid.

Named as co-defendants are TBT's owners, Robert J. Tuttle and Mark S. Edwards.

In a related case filed in the same court, on January 6, U. S. District Court Judge Anne Conway rejected TBT's request for a preliminary injunction to enjoin the FTC from enforcing the TSR.

Judge Conway concluded that TBT failed to show that it had a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of any of its claims challenging the application of the TSR to TBT's proposed use of prerecorded calls to solicit funds on behalf of a charity.



Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.


Consumer News

May 17 2008

Recent Recalls & Safety Alerts

READER SERVICES

Print, Email & More

Subscribe

Free consumer newsletters
Sign up now!





Back to the top |

Advertisement


Home | Rogues Gallery | Good Guys | Complaint Form | News | Recalls | Search | Video | FAQ |
Consumer Resources | Small Claims Guide | Lemon Law | Newsletter | Contact Us
Advertise With Us | Testimonials | Newsroom | RSS Feeds | Radio | Job Postings




Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.