Complain about a product or service

AmeriDebt Founder Settles FTC Charges for $35 Million

January 11, 2006

Credit Counseling • Equifax Subsidiary Agrees to Settle FTC Charges • Credit "Repair" Company Agrees to Settle FTC Charges • New Jersey Sues Credit Repair Agencies • States And FTC Crack Down On Credit Repair Scams • AmeriDebt Founder Settles FTC Charges • FTC Charges Home Buying Operation With Credit Repair Scheme • FTC Charges Express Consolidation Misleads Consumers • Debt Free Agrees to West Virginia Refunds • Ohio Sues "Credit Counselor" For Deceiving, Threatening Consumers • Debt Management Telemarketers Settle FTC Charges • FTC Shuts Down 20 "Credit Repair" Schemes • FTC Sues "Debt Elimination" Programs • AmeriDebt Founder Settles FTC Charges for $35 Million • IRS Plans to Yank Tax-Exempt Status of 20 Credit Counselors • IRS Revokes Tax-Exempt Status of Four Credit Counseling Agencies • Three Debt Management Firms Settle Federal Charges • AmeriDebt To Close as Part of FTC Settlement • Credit Counseling Riddled With Fast-Buck Promoters, Congress Finds • Credit Counselors Not Always What They Seem • Credit Counseling Scams On the Rise • Lenders Ratchet Down Payments to Credit Counselors --- • More about Credit Counseling

The Federal Trade Commission has settled its largest case involving deceptive credit counseling and debt management brought by the agency. Andris Pukke, founder of AmeriDebt, Inc.and a related company, DebtWorks, Inc.

The agreement, if approved by a federal court, would require Pukke to give up virtually all of his assets for a consumer redress program for victims of the deception, a fund that ultimately could total as much as $35 million.

The agreement also bars Pukke permanently from engaging in credit counseling, debt management, and credit education activities, prohibits him from violating the Telemarketing Sales Rule, and prohibits him from engaging in other conduct in connection with telemarketing.

"Our case alleges that these defendants used their credit counseling business to deceive nearly 300,000 consumers about the services they provide, the fees they charged, and their status as a non-profit company," said Lydia B. Parnes, director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection. "This settlement bans the defendants from the credit counseling business permanently and requires them to give up the money they made from this scheme."

The settlement ends more than two years of litigation against Pukke, effectively securing virtually all of his personal assets, including homes in Miami Beach and Southern California, for use as consumer redress.

The settlement also settles the claims of a nationwide class action, which had been consolidated for trial with the FTC’s case.

A receiver, appointed by the court in April 2005, to identify and maintain Pukke’s assets, has collected property worth millions of dollars, and the order authorizes him to continue his efforts to locate additional assets.

Any amounts the receiver collects, up to $35 million, would go into the redress fund under the settlement. If the receiver collects assets worth more than $35 million, the excess would go into the bankruptcy estate that was created when Pukke filed for bankruptcy last July.

The Case

In a complaint filed in November 2003, the FTC charged that AmeriDebt, Inc.; DebtWorks, Inc.; and Andris Pukke deceived consumers with claims that AmeriDebt was a nonprofit organization and that it provided counseling services to consumers seeking to get out of debt.

The FTC charged that, rather than operating for charitable purposes as advertised, AmeriDebt funneled profits to affiliated for-profit entities and individuals, including DebtWorks and Pukke. The complaint also charged that the defendants did not provide counseling services, but simply enrolled every customer in a debt management plan (DMP).

According to the FTC, AmeriDebt also deceived customers when it claimed that it did not charge an up-front fee. Instead, the complaint alleged, AmeriDebt kept its clients’ first payment under their DMPs as its own fee, rather than disbursing the money to consumers’ creditors as promised. The complaint charged these practices were deceptive in violation of the Federal Trade Commission Act.

In June 2004, AmeriDebt filed for bankruptcy relief. At the request of the FTC and others, the bankruptcy court removed existing management and appointed a trustee to oversee AmeriDebt. In March 2005, AmeriDebt settled the FTC’s charges by, among other things, agreeing to shut down its debt-management operations.

In April 2005, at the FTC’s request, the court froze the assets of Pukke and DebtWorks, and appointed a receiver to locate and marshal their assets. Andris Pukke filed for bankruptcy in July 2005, and subsequently the District of Maryland court stayed the bankruptcy case pending the outcome of the FTC trial.

Pamela Pukke, Andris Pukke’s estranged wife, was charged as a relief defendant in the case and settled with the Commission in December 2005, by releasing her claims to certain assets and by agreeing to cooperate with the Commission regarding its ongoing actions involving Andris Pukke and DebtWorks.

The settlement imposes a $172 million suspended judgment against the defendants, which will be triggered if they do not comply with the order. In addition, the monetary judgment is based on financial statements provided to the Commission by the defendants; the order requires them to turn over the value of any asset omitted from either financial statement.

Further, the order contains the defendants’ agreement that the assets collected will be held in a constructive trust for consumer victims and used for consumer redress. The Commission, in consultation with the lawyers for the class action, will determine how to set up and implement the redress program. In the event that the money collected instead must go into Pukke’s bankruptcy estate, the FTC will hold a $172 million claim against the bankruptcy estate.

Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.

Share		Follow us on Twitter.

Back to the top |