|
|
CONSUMER NEWS
RECALLS
COMPLAINT FORM
SCAM ALERTS
Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws FAQ Newsletters |
|
|
![]() |
Florida Sues Home Care Provider Targeting Elderly |
|||||
|
January 11, 2006
Clearwater-based Intrust Home Care and its president, Roy F. Fitzgerald, are accused of taking more than $146,000 from several dozen elderly residents despite never contracting or paying for any of the home care services they promised to provide. The lawsuit, filed in Leon County Circuit Court, alleges that Intrust and Fitzgerald sold what were purported to be contracts for home care services, such as dressing, laundry, bathing and housekeeping. Investigators determined that Fitzgerald promised the services but never contracted for anyone to actually provide those services, and failed to maintain reserves to pay for the services should they be needed. Intrust routinely imposed a 6-to-12 month waiting period before the services would be provided, and in at least four instances the victims died before the waiting period had elapsed. Senior victims in Florida, and others in California, Virginia and Illinois, paid for contracts at annual rates ranging from approximately $700 to more than $7,600. Other services Intrust was supposed to provide included meals, toileting, grooming, excursions and mobility assistance. Contract holders were also told falsely that they could order home companions through Intrust. "It is bad enough to make senior citizens wait for one year to receive services they paid for, but we now know they would have waited the rest of their lives to ever have their laundry done or houses cleaned," said Crist. "This is unconscionable behavior." Although the contracts appeared similar to insurance and home health care contracts, they were not, at the time, regulated by any state agency. Typical of those victimized by Fitzgerald and his company is Doris Williams. The 88-year-old Leesburg, Fla., resident contracted with Intrust for home health services, paying more than $3,000. At some point after she purchased the contract, Williams fell and seriously injured her wrist. Believing she could use the services for which she had contracted, Williams tried contacting Intrust but received no response for a year. She finally contacted the Attorney General's Office and filed a complaint against the company. The state is seeking a permanent injunction stopping Intrust from issuing any further insurance-like contracts, and is asking the court to require the company to pay refunds to the victims and pay penalties, costs and fees. Fitzgerald faces possible penalties of up to $915,000 plus restitution. Report Your Experience
|
|
||||
Advertisement
|
|
||||
|
AUTOMOTIVE Dealers Manufacturers Service Extended Warranties Lemon Laws Recalls Tires Transporters FAMILY Aging Children, Parenting Recalls Dating Education Entertainment Pets Weddings |
FINANCE Annuities Banks Credit Cards Debt Collection Debt Counseling Insurance Investing Loans Mortgages Payday Loans Student Loans Tax Prep HEALTH Drugs, Pharmacies Health Clubs Hearing Care Hospitals Nursing Homes Nutrition, Diets Vision Care Weight Loss |
HOMEOWNERS & RENTERS Appliances Cookware Furniture Home Improvements Lawn & Garden Movers Pools & Spas Realtors, Rental Agents Recalls Utilities ELECTRONICS Cable TV/DBS Cameras Cell Phones Computers Home Electronics Internet Access Local Phone Service Long Distance VoIP |
SHOPPING In-Home Online Retail Stores Sporting Goods Supermarkets Telemarketers TRAVEL Airlines Bus Lines Car Rental Cruises Hotels Travel Agents Trains RESOURCES Class Actions Complaint Form Small Claims Guide Lemon Laws |
CONSUMER NEWS Latest News Automotive Telecom Financial Health Homeowners Scams Seniors Travel More ... RECALLS Automotive Children's Products Drugs Food Household Products Sporting Goods ABOUT US FAQ Privacy Policy Advertise With Us Newsroom Syndication Terms of Use |
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|