CONSUMER NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS  


Complain about a product or service

Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish
Automotive    Education    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Shopping    Travel   
NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

Justice Department Publishes Social Security Numbers



By Martin H. Bosworth
ConsumerAffairs.com

January 2, 2006

Internet Providers Admit to Monitoring Customers' Web Surfing
Big Brother Hitching A Ride in California?
GAO: Government Can Do More to Protect Personal Data
US Search Agrees to Stop Selling Private Credit Data
TSA Site Left Passenger Data Exposed To ID Theft
Connecticut Governor Wants 'Opt Out' For Online Directories
Verizon Gave Customer Data To Government Without Court Orders
House Democrats Probe Warrantless Surveillance
---
More Privacy News ...

The Department of Justice (DOJ) is busy defending President Bush's controversial NSA surveillance program and pushing for full authorization of the Patiot Act, claiming that the initiatives will protect Americans from terrorism and secure their civil liberties.

But a few sharp-eyed individuals have found that the DOJ isn't nearly so zealous when it comes to protecting individuals' personal information.

Information Week's Larry Greenemeier reported recently that the DOJ had published several documents containing the full names and Social Security numbers (SSN) of individuals involved in litigation with the agency.

For example, the department published the full name and SSN of a woman involved in a class-action immigration lawsuit filed in 2003 on the DOJ's Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) Web page.

Greenemeier was tipped off by a systems security manager in a California bank, who noticed the information and contacted the DOJ on Nov. 12th, 2005. After being told that the matter was being handled, the manager found the information still available for public view on the site as of Dec. 19th, and contacted Greenemeier.

Greenemeier found several other documents on the EOIR page containing individuals' social security numbers, and contacted the DOJ personally to inform them.

Since then, documentation relating to the immigration case has been "scrubbed" of any Social Security numbers, and the document itself was blocked from view in searches of the DOJ site. The settlement itself is still viewable via various search engines.

In addition to being governed by the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and the Privacy Act, EOIA's "Information Quality Guidelines" specify that "Consistent with applicable disclosure restrictions, EOIR seeks to disseminate information, including relevant supporting data or analyses, in as broad and prompt a manner as possible for the public to benefit from EOIR's efforts and expertise."

Interestingly, the guidelines do not apply to "Information dissemination products relating to or arising from adjudicatory processes,"which would undoubtedly include notice of a class action settlement.

Social Security numbers are used by virtually every government agency to identify individual taxpayers, and are utilized as "personal ID" numbers for state government services, employers, and many businesses. Their repeated usage, and the difficulty in changing an individual number, makes them a prime target for identity thieves who want access to a person's information.

Repeat Offender

The EOIR incident isn't the first time government agencies have been sloppy in how they control access to individual information.

A Government Accountability Office (GAO) report issued in September found that multiple government agencies, including the FBI and IRS, failed to fulfill all the necessary requirements to protect and secure individuals' records.

(/news04/2005/gao_privacy.html)

Many of the identity-theft protection bills awaiting action in Congress have provisions to restrict the usage of Social Security numbers except in specific circumstances. Many states also have laws governing access to Social Security numbers.

Privacy advocates and IT security experts are concerned that weaker Federal legislation may preempt stronger state laws, leaving Social Security numbers and other personal data more vulnerable to theft than before.



Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.


Consumer News

September 5 2008

Recent Recalls & Safety Alerts



FREE CONSUMER NEWSLETTERS

The Daily Consumer
Afternoons M-F

Sign up now!


Consumer News & Alerts
Every Sunday

Sign up now!


Knowledge is free.
Knowledge is power.



Back to the top |

Advertisement


Home | Complaint Form | News | Recalls | FAQ |
Consumer Resources | Small Claims Guide | Lemon Law | Newsletter | Contact Us
Advertise With Us | Testimonials | Newsroom | RSS Feeds |


Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.    The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission.