|
|
NEWS
RECALLS
COMPLAINT FORM
SCAM ALERTS
RESOURCES
Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws FAQ Newsletters |
| Automotive Education Employment Electronics Family Finance Health Homeowners Pets Shopping Travel |
|
|
![]() |
Vonage in Stand-Off With Bells Over 911 |
|||||
|
April 1, 2005
This week, SBC Communications, headquartered in Texas, refused an offer from Vonage to participate in a trial solution. On Feb. 18, Vonage CEO Jeffrey Citron sent a letter to all four major local Bell carriers -- SBC, BellSouth, Verizon Communications and Qwest Communications -- asking them for assistance in tapping into the 9-1-1 system. The enhanced 9-1-1 system connects a caller to the nearest public safety dispatch center and displays the caller's physical location, enabling dispatches to get help rolling even if the caller is disoriented or unable to speak. Citron noted in his letter that Vonage has devised a solution that is working satisfactorily in Rhode Island and hopes to implement it throughout the nation. The problem is that the Rhode Island solution works because the small state has only one public-safety dispatch center and the call system that serves that center is owned by the state. Most states have multiple centers and most 9-1-1 call systems are owned by the local telephone company. SBC declined to participate in the Vonage trial, saying it could not be expected to engage in tests with every single VOIP provider. Vonage said that Qwest conducted a successful 9-1-1 trial in King County, Washington, but has been "stalling" on implementing it systemwide. Verizon has expressed technical concerns and BellSouth suggested that Vonage become certified as a local carrier, something it is trying to avoid. 9-1-1 systems are supported by fees imposed on the telephone companies and passed on by them to their subscribers. The Federal Communications Commission has taken a hands-off approach towards VOIP, hoping to keep it free of the numerous fees and regulations that afflict traditional phone service. Opinions differ on whether state utility regulators would be able to effectively require local phone companies to embrace VOIP participation in 9-1-1. Report Your Experience
|
|||||
Back to the top | |
||||||
Advertisement
|
|
Custom Search
|
||||
|
AUTOMOTIVE Dealers Manufacturers Service Extended Warranties Lemon Laws Recalls Tires Transporters FAMILY Aging Children, Parenting Recalls Dating Education Entertainment Pets Weddings |
FINANCE Annuities Banks Credit Cards Debt Collection Debt Counseling Insurance Investing Loans Mortgages Payday Loans Student Loans Tax Prep HEALTH Doctors Drugs, Pharmacies Health Clubs Hearing Care Hospitals Nursing Homes Nutrition, Diets Vision Care Weight Loss |
HOMEOWNERS & RENTERS Appliances Cookware Furniture Home Improvements Lawn & Garden Movers Pools & Spas Realtors, Rental Agents Recalls Utilities ELECTRONICS Cable TV/DBS Cameras Cell Phones Computers Home Electronics Internet Access Local Phone Service Long Distance VoIP |
SHOPPING In-Home Online Retail Stores Sporting Goods Supermarkets Telemarketers TRAVEL Airlines Bus Lines Car Rental Cruises Hotels Travel Agents Trains RESOURCES Class Actions Complaint Form Small Claims Guide Lemon Laws |
CONSUMER NEWS Latest News Automotive Telecom Financial Health Homeowners Scams Seniors Travel More ... RECALLS Automotive Children's Products Drugs Food Household Products Sporting Goods ABOUT US FAQ Privacy Policy Advertise With Us Newsroom Syndication Terms of Use |
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2009 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|