CONSUMER NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS  


Complain about a product or service

Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish
Automotive    Education    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Shopping    Travel   
NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

Vonage in Stand-Off With Bells Over 911



April 1, 2005
Though still in its infancy, Internet telephone service (VOIP) presents a serious threat to both the landline and wireless telephone businesses, which may explain why traditional telephone companies are resisting bringing VOIP into the the enhanced 9-1-1 system.

VOIP-911
911
FCC Wants Enhanced 911 Service For Cell Phone, VoIP Users
Vonage 911 Caller Put On Hold While House Burns Down
FCC Requires VoIP Carriers to Provide Enhanced 911 Service
FCC Ready to Require VoIP Carriers to Provide 911 Service
Vonage To Tie Into Verizon's 911 System
Connecticut Sues Vonage Over 911 Claims
Michigan Warns Vonage About 911
VOIP 911 Moves To Front Burner At FCC
911 Becoming an Emergency for VOIP Providers
SBC, Vonage in Stand-Off Over 911
Texas Sues Vonage over 911 Access

Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott recently filed suit against Vonage, the nation's largest VOIP provider, alleging that Vonage does not clearly explain to customers that its voice service is not persently capable of emergency 9-1-1 functions.

This week, SBC Communications, headquartered in Texas, refused an offer from Vonage to participate in a trial solution.

On Feb. 18, Vonage CEO Jeffrey Citron sent a letter to all four major local Bell carriers -- SBC, BellSouth, Verizon Communications and Qwest Communications -- asking them for assistance in tapping into the 9-1-1 system.

The enhanced 9-1-1 system connects a caller to the nearest public safety dispatch center and displays the caller's physical location, enabling dispatches to get help rolling even if the caller is disoriented or unable to speak.

Citron noted in his letter that Vonage has devised a solution that is working satisfactorily in Rhode Island and hopes to implement it throughout the nation.

The problem is that the Rhode Island solution works because the small state has only one public-safety dispatch center and the call system that serves that center is owned by the state. Most states have multiple centers and most 9-1-1 call systems are owned by the local telephone company.

SBC declined to participate in the Vonage trial, saying it could not be expected to engage in tests with every single VOIP provider.

Vonage said that Qwest conducted a successful 9-1-1 trial in King County, Washington, but has been "stalling" on implementing it systemwide. Verizon has expressed technical concerns and BellSouth suggested that Vonage become certified as a local carrier, something it is trying to avoid.

9-1-1 systems are supported by fees imposed on the telephone companies and passed on by them to their subscribers. The Federal Communications Commission has taken a hands-off approach towards VOIP, hoping to keep it free of the numerous fees and regulations that afflict traditional phone service.

Opinions differ on whether state utility regulators would be able to effectively require local phone companies to embrace VOIP participation in 9-1-1.

Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.


Consumer News

May 17 2008

Recent Recalls & Safety Alerts

READER SERVICES

Print, Email & More

Subscribe

Free consumer newsletters
Sign up now!



Back to the top |

Advertisement


Home | Rogues Gallery | Good Guys | Complaint Form | News | Recalls | Search | Video | FAQ |
Consumer Resources | Small Claims Guide | Lemon Law | Newsletter | Contact Us
Advertise With Us | Testimonials | Newsroom | RSS Feeds | Radio | Job Postings




Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.