|
|
NEWS
RECALLS
COMPLAINT FORM
SCAM ALERTS
RESOURCES
Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws FAQ Newsletters |
Share |
| Automotive Education Employment Electronics Family Finance Health Homeowners Insurance Pets Shopping Travel |
|
|
|
![]() |
FDA Panel Gives Vioxx a Yellow Light |
|||||||||||||
|
February 18, 2005
The FDA said it would announce its decision within the next few weeks. The panel strongly recommended that Vioxx and the other COX-2 drugs should not be promoted directly to consumers, warning that upbeat TV and print ads build demand for the medication among patients who might do well on less potent drugs. Merck withdrew the anti-inflammatory drug from the market last year after Vioxx showed a twofold increase in serious cardiovascular events. Lawsuits rained down on the company and its stock price plummeted. FDA scientist David Graham, who believes the drug caused more than 80,000 heart attacks and strokes in the United States since its 1999 launch, said he was disappointed with the panel's decision. The FDA panel's recommendation was welcomed by millions of chronic pain sufferers who say the powerful COX-2 drugs are the only ones that give them any lasting pain relief. But medical experts say doctors will now be reluctant to prescribe the drugs in all but the most compelling cases. Although multiple studies have found that the COX-2 drugs raise the risk of heart attack and stroke, other pain relief medications also carry risks. Aspirin and its derivatives can cause bleeding and narcotic-based drugs reduce alertness and can be habituating. Several of the panel members recommended said that patients first try naproxen, sold as Aleve by Bayer, before taking any of the COX-2 drugs. The vote recommending Vioxx be made available to consumers was close, 17-15. The advisory panel voted 31-1 to keep Celebrex on the market and 17-13 for Bextra. "The data are very compelling; Vioxx is substantially worse than the others," said Alistair Wood of Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, the chairman of the FDA panel. Wood also said physicians should be "more thoughtful" when prescribing Vioxx and the other COX-2 inhibitors. Massachusetts LawasuitIn Massacusetts, healthcare activists in Massachusetts sued Merck and Pfizer, charging their marketing campaigns misled consumers by advertising benefits of the drugs while not disclosing the full range of risks and shortcomings. The suits were filed in Massachusetts state court Thursday, the day before President Bush signed a new law requiring such cases to be filed in federal courts. Report Your Experience
|
|||||||||||||
Back to the top | |
||||||||||||||
Advertisement
|
|
Custom Search
|
||||
|
AUTOMOTIVE Dealers Manufacturers Service Extended Warranties Lemon Laws Recalls Tires Transporters FAMILY Aging Children, Parenting Recalls Dating Education Entertainment Pets Weddings |
FINANCE Annuities Banks Credit Cards Debt Collection Debt Counseling Insurance Investing Loans Mortgages Payday Loans Student Loans Tax Prep HEALTH Doctors Drugs, Pharmacies Health Clubs Hearing Care Hospitals Nursing Homes Nutrition, Diets Vision Care Weight Loss |
HOUSE & HOME Appliances Cookware Furniture Home Improvements Lawn & Garden Movers Pools & Spas Realtors, Rental Agents Recalls Utilities ELECTRONICS Cable TV/DBS Cameras Cell Phones Computers Home Electronics Internet Access Local Phone Service Long Distance VoIP |
SHOPPING In-Home Online Retail Stores Sporting Goods Supermarkets Telemarketers TRAVEL Airlines Bus Lines Car Rental Cruises Hotels Travel Agents Trains RESOURCES Class Actions Complaint Form Small Claims Guide Lemon Laws |
CONSUMER NEWS Latest News Automotive Telecom Financial Health Homeowners Scams Seniors Travel More ... RECALLS Automotive Children's Products Drugs Food Household Products Sporting Goods ABOUT US FAQ Privacy Policy Advertise With Us Newsroom Syndication Terms of Use |
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2009 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|