CONSUMER NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS  


Complain about a product or service

Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish
Automotive    Education    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Shopping    Travel   
NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

Bridgestone/Firestone Agrees to Give Returning Guardsman His Pay Raise



March 30, 2005
After being sued by the U.S. Justice Department, Bridgestone/Firestone has agreed to give a returning member of the Army National Guard the pay raises he is entitled to under federal law.

"Federal law makes clear that reserve soldiers called to active duty have a right to re-employment in comparable jobs with their former employer when they return to civilian life," said R. Alexander Acosta, Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division.

"These soldiers risk their lives to protect our basic liberties. Employers should not punish them for their service to our nation by denying them civilian employment and benefits," he said.

The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, alleged that Bridgestone violated the Uniformed Services Employment and Re-employment Rights Act of 1994 (“USERRA”) by failing to advance the guardsman on its progressive pay schedule during a period of approximately 15 months while the guardsman was serving on active military duty.

According to the government’s complaint, the guardsman joined the Army National Guard in August 2000. He was subsequently hired by Bridgestone in May 2002. The guardsman was then activated as a member of the Army National Guard under Operation Enduring Freedom/Iraqi Freedom from December 2002 to March 2004.

Upon his return to Bridgestone, the guardsman was paid at the same rate as when he left, rather than being advanced on the company’s progressive pay schedule.

The Veterans’ Employment and Training Service (VETS) of the Labor Department referred the guardsman’s complaint to the Justice Department upon completion of its investigation. In the consent decree, tendered to the district court for approval and entry, Bridgestone has agreed to both advance the guardsman on its progressive pay schedule and pay him lost earnings, plus interest.

Acosta noted that Bridgestone voluntarily cooperated with the investigation of the guardsman’s USERRA complaint and, while denying any wrongdoing, agreed to make the guardsman whole for his loss.

This is the third USERRA complaint filed by the Justice Department since the Civil Rights Division received enforcement authority for USERRA cases in September 2004. USERRA protects the re-employment rights of service members or veterans upon their return to civilian life from active duty.

More information about USERRA is available at www.dol.gov/vets/programs/userra/main.htm.

Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.


Consumer News

August 28 2008

Recent Recalls & Safety Alerts



FREE CONSUMER NEWSLETTERS

The Daily Consumer
Afternoons M-F

Sign up now!


Consumer News & Alerts
Every Sunday

Sign up now!


Knowledge is free.
Knowledge is power.



Back to the top |

Advertisement


Home | Complaint Form | News | Recalls | FAQ |
Consumer Resources | Small Claims Guide | Lemon Law | Newsletter | Contact Us
Advertise With Us | Testimonials | Newsroom | RSS Feeds |


Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.    The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission.