CONSUMER NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS  


Complain about a product or service

Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish
Automotive    Education    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Shopping    Travel   
NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

Texas Sues Vonage over 911 Access



March 22, 2005
Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott has filed a lawsuit against Vonage, the country’s largest Internet-based telephone service provider, for failing to make clear to consumers that the company’s current service does not include access to traditional emergency 9-1-1 service.

VOIP-911
911
FCC Wants Enhanced 911 Service For Cell Phone, VoIP Users
Vonage 911 Caller Put On Hold While House Burns Down
FCC Requires VoIP Carriers to Provide Enhanced 911 Service
FCC Ready to Require VoIP Carriers to Provide 911 Service
Vonage To Tie Into Verizon's 911 System
Connecticut Sues Vonage Over 911 Claims
Michigan Warns Vonage About 911
VOIP 911 Moves To Front Burner At FCC
911 Becoming an Emergency for VOIP Providers
SBC, Vonage in Stand-Off Over 911
Texas Sues Vonage over 911 Access

The dangers posed by Vonage’s failure to clearly disclose the lack of traditional 9-1-1 access surfaced last month when a Houston family that subscribed to Vonage’s service tried to call 9-1-1 during a home invasion. Two victims were shot multiple times, but the victims’ daughter was never able to get through to 9-1-1.

“This Houston family’s moment of crisis signals a dire need for Vonage to clearly communicate to its Internet telephone customers that 9-1-1 access may not be available to them,” said Attorney General Abbott. “This is not just about bad customer service; it’s a matter of life and death.”

Joyce John, who joined Attorney General Abbott today in his announcement, attempted in vain to reach 9-1-1 dispatchers in February as would-be burglars fired shots through her home and threatened her parents at gunpoint, eventually wounding them.

When John hurriedly placed the call from an upstairs room, a voice recording informed her that no emergency access was available from that line. The burglars fled the scene before causing more harm, and the victims survived their injuries.

The lawsuit, filed under the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act, requests injunctive measures to stop Vonage Holdings Corp. – a broadband phone company based in New Jersey – from misrepresenting the type of emergency telephone service it offers, and the fact that the “911 dialing” feature is not automatically included when a customer signs up for telephone service. The suit seeks $20,000 per violation.

The lawsuit alleges Vonage is deceiving consumers by not revealing in its television commercials, brochures or other marketing materials that customers must proactively sign up for 9-1-1 service.

When consumers purchase the plan over the phone, call center salespeople also fail to disclose this important information. Even after signing up, there are limitations to the service that Vonage customers may never know about unless they read the fine print buried on the company’s Web site, Abbott said.

Internet-based telephone providers are unregulated by state and federal communications authorities. Though some of these providers offer 9-1-1 access, they are not required to do so. However, many consumers, like the John family, may not be aware of this fact.

Vonage advertises that its service includes “911 dialing.” However, it fails to make clear that when a customer signs up for Vonage’s service, the customer does not automatically have the ability to dial 9-1-1 and be connected to emergency personnel. Instead, the customer first has to take steps to activate Vonage’s “911 dialing” feature, which has significant limitations as compared to traditional 9-1-1 service.

For example, customers who dial 9-1-1 through Vonage’s “911 dialing” service are routed through administrative lines at 9-1-1 call centers, not directly to call-station operators who dispatch emergency vehicles. Calls outside regular business hours may not be answered. If emergency personnel do get the call, they may not be able to identify the caller’s phone number and will not have information about the caller’s address.

Attorney General Abbott urges Internet-based phone users to contact their Internet telephone service providers immediately to determine whether they are able to dial 9-1-1.

Sales of this communication option to consumers increased tenfold from 2003 to 2004, according to industry reports. Vonage alone boasts more than 500,000 subscribers. Internet service provider EarthLink is a reseller of Vonage’s Internet telephone service.



Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.


Consumer News

May 17 2008

Recent Recalls & Safety Alerts

READER SERVICES

Print, Email & More

Subscribe

Free consumer newsletters
Sign up now!



Back to the top |

Advertisement


Home | Rogues Gallery | Good Guys | Complaint Form | News | Recalls | Search | Video | FAQ |
Consumer Resources | Small Claims Guide | Lemon Law | Newsletter | Contact Us
Advertise With Us | Testimonials | Newsroom | RSS Feeds | Radio | Job Postings




Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.