Complain about a product or service

Texas, Merck Spar Over Vioxx Trial Site

August 8, 2005
Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott has sharply rebuked pharmaceutical giant Merck & Co. of New Jersey for attempting an end-run around the state's lawsuit accusing it of misrepresenting the safety of Vioxx. Merck is asking that the lawsuit be removed from state court to federal court.

Related Stories • First Vioxx Judgment Overturned On Appeal • Merck Agrees to Pay $58 Million to Settle Vioxx Claims • Researchers Claim Merck Cooked Vioxx Data • Common Pain Relievers May Boost Muscle Mass • More Painkillers Can Cause More Pain • Merck Caves, Agrees To $4.85 Billion Vioxx Settlement • New York Sues Vioxx Maker over Drug’s Risks • Merck Wins Vioxx Case In Illinois • Judge Rules Out Vioxx "Super" Class Action • FDA Critic Blasts Merck's Vioxx Replacement • Merck Loses New Orleans Vioxx Case • Merck Wins Latest Vioxx Suit • Vioxx Study Authors Backtrack On Claim • Older Painkillers May Increase Heart Attack Risk • More about Vioxx --- Other NSAIDs • Bextra • Celebrex • Dangers of Other Vioxx-Type Drugs • Vioxx Alternatives • Aleve Ingredient Seen as Health Risk

“Merck may try to run from the Texas courts, but they will not be able to hide from their scheme to misrepresent the safety of Vioxx to Texans,” said Attorney General Abbott. “The company is clearly trying to evade justice by using these delay tactics.

“This is a major disappointment to the taxpayers of Texas, who deserve to be reimbursed for the company’s wrongful scheme to defraud Medicaid. I urge Merck to stop evading their obligations. A Texas jury deserves to hear evidence of fraud in a Texas district court.”

Abbott in turn filed a request for remand in court on the heels of Merck’s filing, telling U.S. District Judge Lee Yeakel that no federal issue exists to warrant such a venue change. The state’s suit contends the company failed to tell physicians and consumers that the painkilling prescription drug Vioxx might cause cardiovascular problems. The company also pushed to place Vioxx on the state’s Medicaid list for approved medicines, knowing this danger existed.

The attorney general alleges Merck aggressively marketed the drug to the medical community, and in doing so, willfully misrepresented its own studies and the concerns of physicians who suggested the drug might sharply increase the risk of heart problems.

The Texas Medicaid program reimbursed pharmacists $56 million for Vioxx prescriptions they filled for patients over a five-year period. Abbott is invoking a provision in state law that allows for that amount to be automatically tripled to $168 million, which Merck would have to pay to the state of Texas for acts of fraud.

Merck finally conceded the health concerns and voluntarily withdrew the product in September 2004, after aggressively marketing the drug since 1999.

The Texas lawsuit claims Merck’s costly promotional campaign aimed to convince consumers the drug was not only safe, but that they should demand it from their health care professionals for pain.

The company also allegedly tried to intimidate or threaten physicians and researchers who questioned the safety of Vioxx. The company even routinely misrepresented or concealed published evidence, including its own, showing possible harmful effects of the drug, the suit charges.

Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.