CONSUMER NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS  


Complain about a product or service

Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish
Automotive    Education    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Shopping    Travel   
NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

GlaxoSmithKline Misled FDA about Asthma Drug, Public Citizen Charges





October 8, 2005
GlaxoSmithKline presented misleading results to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) from a study of the popular asthma drug salmeterol (Serevent, also known as Advair when combined with the steroid fluticasone), Public Citizen writes in a letter in this week’s issue of The Lancet.

In 1996, the Salmeterol Multicenter Asthma Research Trial was initiated to study tens of thousands of asthma patients who received either salmeterol or a placebo. The study lasted 28 weeks and showed an increased risk of asthma-related death for those taking salmeterol.

The results have never been published, although GlaxoSmithKline presented the interim results to the FDA in July 2003, when the drug came up for review before the FDA’s Pulmonary-Allergy Drugs Advisory Committee. The company submitted final study data to the FDA on August 29, 2003.

However, that data included adverse events that were reported six months after the trial ended and were not to be included, according to the original study protocol. The inclusion of the post-study data reduced the apparent dangers of salmeterol with respect to four critical study outcomes, including asthma-related death.

GlaxoSmithKline did not clearly inform the FDA that the final study included data from six months after the trial had concluded until the FDA inquired about the results in April 2004. The FDA had presumed the data were only from the 28-week trial itself, since that was the “period of interest,” according to the FDA.

Since learning of the suspicious reporting of the study results, the FDA’s Pulmonary-Allergy Drugs Advisory Committee on July 13, 2005, recommended strengthening the warning on the labels for both Servent and Advair, but the agency has yet to make a final decision. Public Citizen learned of the misleading data presentation from materials provided to the advisory committee.

“The behavior of GlaxoSmithKline in submitting these faulty data is deplorable,” said Dr. Peter Lurie, deputy director of Public Citizen’s Health Research Group and co-author of the letter. “Absent greater transparency at the FDA, we will never know how often this kind of self-serving data analysis occurs.”

Public Citizen listed Serevent as a “Do Not Use” drug in its Worst Pills, Best Pills newsletter in March 2003 because of the interim study results.

Salmeterol was dispensed more than 2.1 million times in U.S. pharmacies in 2004. The combination product, Advair, was dispensed more than 16.1 million times in U.S. pharmacies that year.



Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.


Consumer News

August 28 2008

Recent Recalls & Safety Alerts



FREE CONSUMER NEWSLETTERS

The Daily Consumer
Afternoons M-F

Sign up now!


Consumer News & Alerts
Every Sunday

Sign up now!


Knowledge is free.
Knowledge is power.







Back to the top |

Advertisement


Home | Complaint Form | News | Recalls | FAQ |
Consumer Resources | Small Claims Guide | Lemon Law | Newsletter | Contact Us
Advertise With Us | Testimonials | Newsroom | RSS Feeds |


Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.    The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission.