NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS   RESOURCES  
Small Claims Guide   Class Actions   Lemon Laws   FAQ   Newsletters  
Share


Complain about a product or service

Automotive    Education    Employment    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Insurance    Pets    Shopping    Travel     Print This     Email This    



NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

Spitzer Sues Guidant for Hiding Defibrillator Defect





November 4, 2005
New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer has filed a lawsuit against one of the world’s leading manufacturers of medical devices for concealing information about a design flaw in a heart defibrillator.

Device Maker Charged With Unlawful Clinical Trials
Medtronic To Disclose Payments To Doctors
Medtronic Withdaws Defibrillator Wires
Guidant Settles Defibrillator Charges For $16.7 Million
Court Orders Guidant To Release Documents
FDA Warns Guidant About Its Heart Devices
Spitzer Sues Guidant for Hiding Defibrillator Defect
FDA Report Addresses Heart Device Malfunctions
Potentially Harmful Medical Devices Should Be Recalled, Public Citizen Tells FDA
FDA Knew Of Pacemaker Problems Before Recall
Guidant To Resume Defibrillator Sales
Guidant Recalls Pacemakers
Guidant Pacemakers May Be Recalled
FDA Upgrades Guidant Recalls
Guidant Finds More Defibrillator Problems
FDA Recalls Guidant Implantable Defibrillators
Company Withheld News of Flaw in Defibrillator
Medicare To Cover More Defibrillators

The lawsuit alleges that the Guidant Corporation failed to inform doctors about a mechanical problem that could cause the implanted device to malfunction with potentially fatal consequences.

"Concealment of negative facts that might influence a consumer to purchase another manufacturer’s product is the essence of fraud," Spitzer said. "We wouldn’t permit this type of conduct in connection with the sale of cars or washing machines. It is simply unconscionable that it occurred with a critical medical device."

The lawsuit filed November 2, 2005, in New York State Supreme Court in Manhattan alleges that the Indianapolis-based company engaged in fraud by failing to disclose to physicians information about a flaw in its implantable cardio defibrillator -- the Ventak Prizm 2 DR Model 1861.

The device is surgically implanted in the body of a patient at high risk of sudden cardiac death due to an abnormal heart rhythm. It’s supposed to deliver a controlled electric shock to restore normal functioning of the heart muscle. But if the device fails, the normal rhythm may not be restored, the heart may stop and the patient may die.

The lawsuit contends that in February, 2002, Guidant discovered a design flaw that caused some Prizm 1861 models to short out. It further states that between April and November of 2002, Guidant made certain engineering changes to correct the flaw.

The company, however, continued to sell Prizm 1861 defibrillators in which the design flaw had not been corrected. And for more than three years, Guidant failed to notify doctors of the defect in the older models.

In fact, Guidant did not reveal the facts about the Prizm 1861 defibrillator until May, 2005, on the day before the information was to be revealed in a news article in The New York Times.

The electrical short has been implicated in at least 28 failures of the Prizm 1861 defibrillator, including one that resulted in the death of a patient.

Through the lawsuit, the attorney general is seeking:

• a court order that will require Guidant to fully disclose to medical professionals relevant design and performance information about its medical devices.

• restitution for any patient who wishes to replace a Prizm 1861 defibrillator made before the 2002 manufacturing changes.

• disgorgement of Guidant’s profits from the sale of defective Prizm 1861 defibrillators.

In June of this year, Guidant voluntarily recalled Prizm 1861 defibrillators manufactured before April 2002.

At the time Guidant issued its recall, approximately 13,900 defibrillators made before the April 2002 were still in use by patients in the U.S.



Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.

Share

Follow us on Twitter.

FREE CONSUMER NEWSLETTERS

The Daily Consumer
Afternoons M-F

Sign up now!


Consumer News & Alerts
Every Sunday

Sign up now!





CONSUMER NEWS

SAFETY RECALLS

Back to the top |

Advertisement


Custom Search
AUTOMOTIVE
• Dealers
• Manufacturers
• Service
• Extended Warranties
• Lemon Laws
• Recalls
• Tires
• Transporters

FAMILY
• Aging
• Children, Parenting
• Recalls
• Dating
• Education
• Entertainment
• Pets
• Weddings
FINANCE
• Annuities
• Banks
• Credit Cards
• Debt Collection
• Debt Counseling
• Insurance
• Investing
• Loans
• Mortgages
• Payday Loans
• Student Loans
• Tax Prep

HEALTH
• Doctors
• Drugs, Pharmacies
• Health Clubs
• Hearing Care
• Hospitals
• Nursing Homes
• Nutrition, Diets
• Vision Care
• Weight Loss
HOUSE & HOME
• Appliances
• Cookware
• Furniture
• Home Improvements
• Lawn & Garden
• Movers
• Pools & Spas
• Realtors, Rental Agents
• Recalls
• Utilities

ELECTRONICS
• Cable TV/DBS
• Cameras
• Cell Phones
• Computers
• Home Electronics
• Internet Access
• Local Phone Service
• Long Distance
• VoIP
SHOPPING
• In-Home
• Online
• Retail Stores
• Sporting Goods
• Supermarkets
• Telemarketers

TRAVEL
• Airlines
• Bus Lines
• Car Rental
• Cruises
• Hotels
• Travel Agents
• Trains

RESOURCES
• Class Actions
• Complaint Form
• Small Claims Guide
• Lemon Laws
CONSUMER NEWS
• Latest News
• Automotive
• Telecom
• Financial
• Health
• Homeowners
• Scams
• Seniors
• Travel
• More ...

RECALLS
• Automotive
• Children's Products
• Drugs
• Food
• Household Products
• Sporting Goods

ABOUT US
• FAQ
• Privacy Policy
• Advertise With Us
• Newsroom
• Syndication
• Terms of Use

Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2009 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.    The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission.