Complain about a product or service

Supreme Court Rejects H&R Block Appeal in Refund Loan Class Action

January 11, 2005
The Supreme Court has refused to hear an appeal from H&R Block, leaving intact a lower court's decision that a class-action case against the tax preparation giant can go forward.

H&R Block • Charges • Electronic Filing • Errors • "Free" Filing • Online • Refund Anticipation Loans • Taxcut • Option One Mortgage Corp. -- News • American Home Mortgage Servicing Agrees To 8200 Modifications • Massachusetts Court Stops H&R Block, Option One Foreclosures • Massachusetts Blocks H&R Block, Option One Foreclosures • New York Stops H&R Block's Deceptive Sweepstakes Ads • California Sues H&R Block • H&R Block Sells Subprime Mortgage Unit • H&R Block Launching Its Bank • H&R Block Threatened Employees, Spitzer Charges • H&R Block Settles Tax Refund Loan Suit • H&R Block Readies New Bank as Business Soars • NY Accuses H&R Block of IRA Marketing Fraud • H&R Block Goofs on Its Own Taxes • Children's Defense Fund: Tax Refund Loans "Indefensible" • California Sues H&R Block Over Its "Instant Refund" Loans • H&R Block Doesn't Block Identity Theft • H&R Block Will Settle More Payday Loan Suits • Option One Agrees to Clean Up Its Lending Practices in PA • H&R Blocked: Consumer Groups Oppose Tax Giant's Proposed Bank • Tentative Settlement in Tax Loan Class Action • Class Action Challenges Electronic Filing Fee • Supreme Court Rejects Block Appeal in Class Action • Judge Upholds Racketeering Complaints Against H&R Block, Household • Court Clears Class-Action Suit • Tax Loans Victimize Consumers --- • All About HSBC

The suit, filed on behalf of as many as 17 million H&R Block customers, contends that Block charged interest rates of more than 100 percent on refund loans and failed to properly inform customers of the finance charges they were paying.

H&R Block and Household International Inc., its banking affiliate, once tried to settle the case for $25 million but a federal appeals court overturned the settlement in 2002, saying that consumers' interests had not been adequately represented.

With the Supreme Court having rejected the company's appeal, the case is now set to go to trial later this year in federal court in Chicago.

The case began in February 1995, when the sole named plaintiff, Lynne A. Carnegie of New York, had a Block office prepare her taxes. Beneficial Finance, now Household International, made the loan in anticipation of her income-tax refund. Carnegie paid $110 for a nine-day refund loan of $500.

Attorneys representing consumers say her case illustrates "the extraordinarily high interest rates and other charges" Block levies on its clients. The suit says the company "preys upon vulnerable, low-income taxpayers." Millions of such loans are made each year for flat fees that equate to annual interest charges of several hundred percent and in some cases reach 2,000 percent.

The companies face potential treble damages that could run to billions of dollars if arguments by the plaintiffs' lawyers prevail in the case, which has been working its way through the courts since the late 1990's.

Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.

Share		Follow us on Twitter.

Back to the top |

Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2009 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.    The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission.