Complain about a product or service

Enforma System Promoters Settle FTC Charges

March 1, 2005
California infomercial producer Modern Interactive Technology, Inc. (MIT), and its two principals have agreed to settle Federal Trade Commission charges that they had an active role in developing the deceptive claims made to sell “The Enforma System” weight-loss products.

This is the last case growing out of the sales of the Enforma System, a weight-loss product consisting of two dietary supplements – “Fat Trapper” and “Exercise In A Bottle.”

In April 2000, the FTC announced that it had settled charges against Enforma Natural Products, Inc., the vendor of the Enforma System. The order in that case required Enforma Natural Products and its principal Andrew Grey to pay $10 million in consumer redress.

Then, in August 2000, the FTC filed a complaint in federal district court against MIT and its officers, alleging that they played an active role in writing, editing, and producing the infomercials for the Enforma System.

In September 2001, however, the district court issued an order ruling that the Commission had no right to bring a separate action against the infomercial producers. The Commission appealed this ruling to the Ninth Circuit Court, and in September 2004, the Ninth Circuit reversed the district court.

It held that Enforma Natural Products was not sufficiently connected to MIT and its principals to justify barring the FTC’s claims against them, and remanded the matter to the district court for litigation.

The settlement announced today resolves the charges without the need for further court proceedings.

The settlement order:

• requires the defendants to have competent and reliable scientific evidence for claims that any dietary supplement, food, drug, or device causes weight loss or maintenance, prevents fat absorption, or causes increased metabolism or fat- burning claims;

• prevents the defendants from misrepresenting the profession, expertise, training, education, experience, or qualifications of any person who advertises, promotes, or endorses any product, service, or program;

• requires the defendants to have competent and reliable scientific evidence to support any representation about the health or weight-loss benefits, performance, safety, or efficacy of any dietary supplement, food, drug, or device; and

• prohibits the defendants from misrepresenting test results.

The order does not require the defendants to pay consumer redress but contains an avalanche clause for $2 million, the amount the defendants were paid for producing the Enforma infomercials, which will be triggered if they have misrepresented their current financial condition.

Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.

Follow us on Twitter.

Back to the top |

Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2010 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.    The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission.