|
|
NEWS
RECALLS
COMPLAINT FORM
SCAM ALERTS
RESOURCES
Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws FAQ Newsletters |
Share |
| Automotive Education Employment Electronics Family Finance Health Homeowners Insurance Pets Shopping Travel |
|
|
|
![]() |
FCC Disconnects Stand-Alone DSL Service |
|||||||||||||
|
March 26, 2005
The regional Bell companies have been losing millions of subscribers per year as customers abandon land lines for cell phones. They fear that Internet phone service could cause an even greater exodus of basic customers. Qwest Communications is presently the only large regional telephone company that sells its DSL service as a "naked" stand-alone. Verizon, SBC and BellSouth all require that customers subscribe to basic telephone service before they can buy DSL. The 3-2 FCC decision, which followed party lines, involved a BellSouth case that has been pending since 2003. Republicans, led by outgoing Chairman Michael E. Powell, voted to pre-empt state regulations requiring telephone companies to sell stand-alone DSL service. Democrats Jonathan S. Adelstein and Michael J. Copps dissented, calling the decision anti-competitive. Florida, Kentucky, Louisiana and Georgia have state rules that allow customers to subscribe to DSL as a stand-alone service. Of BellSouth's 1.9 million DSL subscribers, about 8,000 do not buy their phone service from BellSouth. BellSouth contended the state rules were unfair and asked the FCC to decree that since federal regulations do not require regional phone companies to provide stand-alone service, the states should bow to the federal standard. In their dissent, Adelstein and Copps said the commission used the "heavy hammer of preemption" without considering consumers' interests. "If it is permissible to deny consumers DSL if they do not also order analog voice service, what stops a carrier from denying broadband service to an end-user who has cut the cord and uses only a wireless phone?" they asked. "What prevents a carrier from refusing to provide DSL service to a savvy consumer who wants stand-alone broadband only for VoIP?" Copps and Adelstein echoed the concerns of smaller carriers and Internet phone providers like Vonage. They have argued that allowing companies to require customers to buy DSL Internet access and phone service from a single provider limits consumers' choices. BellSouth applauded the decision, which it said would "provide the regulatory assurance necessary to justify the levels of investment required to support the high-speed networks and services of tomorrow."
Report Your Experience
|
|||||||||||||
Back to the top | |
||||||||||||||
Advertisement
|
|
Custom Search
|
||||
|
AUTOMOTIVE Dealers Manufacturers Service Extended Warranties Lemon Laws Recalls Tires Transporters FAMILY Aging Children, Parenting Recalls Dating Education Entertainment Pets Weddings |
FINANCE Annuities Banks Credit Cards Debt Collection Debt Counseling Insurance Investing Loans Mortgages Payday Loans Student Loans Tax Prep HEALTH Doctors Drugs, Pharmacies Health Clubs Hearing Care Hospitals Nursing Homes Nutrition, Diets Vision Care Weight Loss |
HOUSE & HOME Appliances Cookware Furniture Home Improvements Lawn & Garden Movers Pools & Spas Realtors, Rental Agents Recalls Utilities ELECTRONICS Cable TV/DBS Cameras Cell Phones Computers Home Electronics Internet Access Local Phone Service Long Distance VoIP |
SHOPPING In-Home Online Retail Stores Sporting Goods Supermarkets Telemarketers TRAVEL Airlines Bus Lines Car Rental Cruises Hotels Travel Agents Trains RESOURCES Class Actions Complaint Form Small Claims Guide Lemon Laws |
CONSUMER NEWS Latest News Automotive Telecom Financial Health Homeowners Scams Seniors Travel More ... RECALLS Automotive Children's Products Drugs Food Household Products Sporting Goods ABOUT US FAQ Privacy Policy Advertise With Us Newsroom Syndication Terms of Use |
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2009 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|