|
CONSUMER NEWS RECALLS COMPLAINT FORM SCAM ALERTS |
| Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish | |
|
|
![]() |
Connecticut Sues Vonage Over 911 Claims |
|||||
|
May 4, 2005
Vonage is one of the largest providers of Internet-based telephone service - also known as "Voice Over Internet Protocol (VoIP)." Companies offer VoIP as the affordable alternative to conventional telephone services, but some fail to provide the same 911 emergency network access. The lawsuit alleges that Vonage misrepresents its 911 dialing feature by failing to properly disclose that 911 calls over its service may take longer; may not be routed to a live operator; and are at greater risk of encountering a busy signal. Buried in fine print, the company also advises consumers to maintain other means of calling 911. These limitations could delay - or completely prevent - emergency response. In one recent incident, a Torrington, Conn., woman dialed 911 when her infant son required immediate medical attention. Rather than connecting to an emergency dispatcher, the woman's call was routed to the police department's main number where she was greeted by a recording. Blumenthal and Department of Consumer Protection (DCP) Commissioner Edwin R. Rodriguez urge consumer caution when subscribing to VoIP services. They point out that some VoIP services do not offer 911 access at all. Others may route 911 calls through administrative lines to call centers - rather than directly to local 911 emergency dispatchers. Emergency dispatchers may have more difficulty verifying the caller's address in these cases, causing response delays. "This lawsuit should send an emergency message to Vonage - and every Internet phone provider - that 911 is too important for half-truths," Blumenthal said. "Inadequate disclosure about 911 capabilities is not only bad business - it's life threatening." The state's lawsuit against Vonage seeks financial penalties and improved disclosures to consumers about its 911 service capabilities. "The company deceptively leads consumers to believe their emergency access will be as reliable as conventional landlines. Every second wasted routing calls could mean life or death. This lawsuit should sound an alarm: Consumers need and deserve to know whether 911 means real, immediate human help, or an answering machine," Blumenthal said. "Consumers need to know exactly what their 911 emergency dialing capabilities are," Rodriguez said. "How Vonage represents those capabilities leaves a false impression that dialing 911 will result in direct contact with emergency dispatchers. There is evidence that that is not the case. As a matter of public safety, consumers need full disclosure of the facts in order to make a decision that could have life or death consequences." Report Your Experience
|
|||||
Back to the top | |
||||||
Advertisement
|
Home |
Rogues Gallery |
Good Guys |
Complaint Form |
News |
Recalls |
Search |
Video |
FAQ |
|
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. |