CONSUMER NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS  


Complain about a product or service

Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish
Automotive    Education    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Shopping    Travel   
NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

A Test of Means .. Or a Mean Test?

Advertisement



The central tenet of S.256 is that increased claims of bankruptcy have enabled abuses, allowing people to escape their debts without paying what they owe. The word "crisis" has been tossed about in much the same way as the debate over Social Security.

Obama Calls for Bankruptcy Law Reform
Bankruptcy Recovery Time Longer than Many Expect
Bankruptcy Rates Rise Among Older Americans
Consumer Bankruptcies Up 47% from Last Year
Bankruptcy Filings Soared in February
Senate To Debate Bankruptcy Law Changes
Dodd Announces Bankruptcy Reform Legislation
Bankruptcy's Early Warning Signs
Credit Counseling Not Helpful in Bankruptcy Cases, Study Finds
New Bankruptcy Law, One Year Later
Bankruptcy Filings Set Record in 2005
Consumer Borrowing Plunges In October
Lawsuit Challenges New Bankruptcy Law
New Bankruptcy Law Tightens Rules, Adds Paperwork
Bankruptcy Filings Surge Ahead Of New Law
IRS Plans to Yank Tax-Exempt Status of 20 Credit Counselors
Credit Cards Ensnare, Victimize Working Families, Report Finds
Congress May Modify Bankruptcy "Reform" that Penalizes Katrina Victims
---
Related Stories

Red & Blue United
A Test of Means or A Mean Test?
Cui Bono? (Who Profits?)
Long View, Long Road
"Laws Can Be Written Again"
What You Can Do
Senate Passes MBNA's Bankruptcy Bill
Congress Ready to Tighten Bankruptcy Law
Medical Bills Leading Cause of Bankruptcy, Harvard Study Finds

But a closer look reveals that a majority of those who declare bankruptcy in America do so because of real crises -- long-term unemployment, ballooning health care costs and the ruthless tactics of credit-card companies.

A small, but vitally important, part of the 500-page bill is the six-page section dealing with a "means test." The "means test" is the system by which the IRS determines who can legitimately file for bankruptcy, and who cannot. The test is a rigorous process involving examination of the debtor's income and expenses, calculations as to whether or not their expenses meet the standards of their area, and judgments relating to whether or not they genuinely qualify for a Chapter 7 filing.

However, while the process itself is exhaustive, the rationale behind it is less so.

Under S.256, the "means test" would be applied to any debtor filing under Chapter 7, regardless of their circumstances, status, or reasons for declaring. There would be no discretion if a claimant filed due to inability to pay health care costs, or if they maxed out all of their credit cards and wasted their savings on trips to Vegas.

In a manner reminiscent of ChexSystems, the inflexible standard is designed to leave no leeway for debtors to abuse the system, but in the process it is bound to penalize a great many people who have fallen into bad circumstances through no fault of their own.

In addition, according to Sam Gerdano, executive director of the American Bankruptcy Institute, the means test fails to account for dramatic changes in income over the six-month means test period, including loss of a job and obtaining a new one with a much lower salary.

"Averaging your income, however, might disadvantage those who've lost a job during the 6 months", he said in a Washington Post online chat on March 10th. "That they earned a high income previously would skew the result to suggest they have greater repayment capacity. This is one of the shortcomings of the means test."

Other changes proposed by S. 256 include eliminating an automatic stay for evictions, broadening the definition of "nondischargeable" debts (meaning debts that can't be eliminated through Chapter 7 filing) to include certain types of student loans, debts to state and local governments, and monies owed to "governmental units."

There are some stronger consumer protections in place within S.256, such as stronger penalties for abusive creditor practices, but those are contingent on investigations by authorities, and not part and parcel of the law itself. The bill mandates credit counseling and instruction by a "personal financial management instruction course" in order for debtors to fully discharge their debt via bankruptcy.

The legislation mandates that the agencies offering the counseling be nonprofit in nature, such as the Consumer Credit Counseling Service of America (CCCS). But according to Jeffrey Morris, resident scholar at the American Bankruptcy Institute, the amount of time necessary to complete the counseling may take debtors away from work, which would put the struggling debtor even farther behind.

"A possible solution would be online Internet courses, but then you have to face the fact that people in bankruptcy probably don't have regular Web access ... they can't afford to take the time to stand in long lines at the library to get online." Morris believes it will be up to debtors' lawyers to step in and provide the resources necessary to get their clients counseling under S. 256.

Speaking of bankruptcy lawyers, another provision of the bill places the burden of proof for bankruptcy on the debtor's lawyer, requiring the attorney's signature on the petition and verification that they have investigated the claim sufficiently and found it to be solid. Morris believes that while this is a necessary tool to ensure that claims are valid, it will also take much longer, cost lawyers time, thus running up legal bills that debtors may have trouble paying.

"Many lawyers will demand their fees up front, or they will decide the case isn't worth their time," he said. This may lead to clients having to deal with lawyers who aren't as well trained or who are more willing to take the money and run, leaving the debtor even closer to financial ruin and with less time to pull their assets together and try again.

Next: Cui Bono? (Who Profits?)



Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.


Consumer News

July 9 2008

Recent Recalls & Safety Alerts

Print, mail, etc.




FREE CONSUMER NEWSLETTERS

The Daily Consumer
Afternoons M-F

Sign up now!


Consumer News & Alerts
Every Sunday

Sign up now!


Knowledge is free.
Knowledge is power.

Back to the top |

Advertisement


Home | Rogues Gallery | Good Guys | Complaint Form | News | Recalls | Search | Site Map | FAQ |
Consumer Resources | Small Claims Guide | Lemon Law | Newsletter | Contact Us
Advertise With Us | Testimonials | Newsroom | RSS Feeds | Video | Job Postings




Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.