Complain about a product or service

SBC Will Keep AT&T Name

By James R. Hood
ConsumerAffairs.com

October 27, 2005
SBC has decided to keep the name AT&T after it completes its acquisition of the long-distance company. In fact, SBC will go farther than that -- it will rename itself and most of its products under the 120-year-old brand.

AT&T • Slamming • Long Distance • Local • Wireless • Broadband • Telemarketers --- News • NY to AT&T: Please Deposit $2.63 Million • AT&T Agrees to Refund Some Ringtone Charges • States Asked to Probe AT&T U-Verse Explosions • AT&T Exits Pay Phone Business • AT&T Changes Contract Policy • AT&T Changes Terms Of Service After Outcry • AT&T Agrees to New Stolen Cell Phone Rules • AT&T Stiffens Language Covering Objectionable Content • AT&T Adds Parental Controls To Mobile Phones • AT&T Slammed Over Rebate Policies • Appeals Court Shreds AT&T Arbitration Clause • Court OKs Rebate Lawsuit against Cingular/AT&T • AT&T Trashes Cingular Brand • AT&T Offers Net Neutrality Concessions To Win Merger Approval • FCC Delays Decision On AT&T/BellSouth Deal • Justice Department Green Lights AT&T-BellSouth Merger • FCC Clears the Way for AT&T-BellSouth Merger • AT&T Trumpets New TV Service • AT&T Web Site Hacked; Customer Data Exposed • AT&T Sues Calling Record Brokers • AT&T Declares Consumers' Personal Data "Corporate Property" • AT&T Plans to Kill Cingular Name • Report: AT&T Acquiring BellSouth • SBC Recast as AT&T • FCC approves AT&T, MCI Deals • Justice Dept. OKs AT&T, MCI Sell-Outs • SBC Will Keep AT&T Name • Consumer Groups Oppose Big Telco Mergers • SBC Buys AT&T • AT&T Will Pay Refunds to New Yorkers • AT&T Will Pull Out of 7 States • AT&T Teams With Sprint to Return to Wireless Business • Minnesota Sues AT&T • Class Action Charges AT&T With Slamming • Another AT&T Rate Hike • AT&T Hiking Minimum Fees • AT&T Faces $780,000 Do-Not-Call Fine • AT&T Will Run Do-Not-Call List • Supreme Court Denies AT&T's Appeal of Arbitration Ruling

SBC initially had planned to continue using its own name but top executives were finally persuaded that its brand is little known outside the 13 states where it provides local phone service.

The Justice Department and Federal Communications Commission are expected to give final approval to the $16 billion deal shortly.

"The AT&T name has a proud and storied heritage, as well as unparalleled recognition around the globe among both businesses and consumers," said SBC CEO Edward E. Whitacre Jr. Among AT&T's assets is a large base of business customers, who marketers feared would have been lukewarm to the SBC name.

AT&T, once known as American Telephone & Telegraph, grew out of the 1876 invention of the telephone by Alexander Graham Bell. SBC, once known as Southwestern Bell Corp., was created by the 1984 breakup of AT&T's national telephone monopoly.

After the AT&T breakup, much of the consumer press adopted the moniker "Baby Bells" to describe SBC and the other local operating companies. In fact, it was those local operating companies that were left with the most valuable asset -- local lines reaching virtually every home in the country -- while AT&T was one of a growing pack of long-distance providers with no direct lifeline to its customers.

Long-distance is an artifical creation. Most of the heavy lifting in a long-distance call occurs at the origination and destination points, with the "interexchange carrier" becoming almost superfluous as the local operating companies expanded their networks and handed off calls directly to each other.

The long-distance business was highly profitable for a decade or so but the development of cell phones and Internet communications began nibbling away at long-distance calling on the one hand while on the other, the FCC finally allowed the local operating companies to get into the long-distance business. In most states, the Bells quickly grabbed more than half the long-distance traffic, at the expense of AT&T, MCI and Sprint.

At its peak, AT&T served more than 60 million customers and charged top-tier prices. Its base is now below 20 million and it has been forced to adopt pricing more in line with its competitors.

The transaction does not affect Cingular Wireless, a joint venture between SBC and BellSouth Corp. Cingular last year acquired AT&T Wireless, which by the time of its acquisition was an independent company no longer owned by AT&T.

Meanwhile, Verizon is preparing to close on its acquisition of MCI, a deal it pursued in rsponse to the SBC/AT&T transaction.

Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.

Share		Follow us on Twitter.

Back to the top |