Complain about a product or service

Justice Dept. OKs AT&T, MCI Sell-Outs

By James R. Hood
ConsumerAffairs.com

October 28, 2005
The Justice Department has given its blessing to the purchase of MCI by Verizon and AT&T by SBC, with the Federal Communications Commission expected to do the same, possibly as early as today.

AT&T • Long Distance • Local • Wireless • Uverse • DSL --- News • NY to AT&T: Please Deposit $2.63 Million • AT&T Agrees to Refund Some Ringtone Charges • States Asked to Probe AT&T U-Verse Explosions • AT&T Exits Pay Phone Business • AT&T Changes Contract Policy • AT&T Changes Terms Of Service After Outcry • AT&T Agrees to New Stolen Cell Phone Rules • AT&T Stiffens Language Covering Objectionable Content • AT&T Adds Parental Controls To Mobile Phones • AT&T Slammed Over Rebate Policies • Appeals Court Shreds AT&T Arbitration Clause • Court OKs Rebate Lawsuit against Cingular/AT&T • AT&T Trashes Cingular Brand • AT&T Offers Net Neutrality Concessions To Win Merger Approval • FCC Delays Decision On AT&T/BellSouth Deal • Justice Department Green Lights AT&T-BellSouth Merger • FCC Clears the Way for AT&T-BellSouth Merger • AT&T Trumpets New TV Service • AT&T Web Site Hacked; Customer Data Exposed • AT&T Sues Calling Record Brokers • AT&T Declares Consumers' Personal Data "Corporate Property" • AT&T Plans to Kill Cingular Name • Report: AT&T Acquiring BellSouth • SBC Recast as AT&T • FCC approves AT&T, MCI Deals • Justice Dept. OKs AT&T, MCI Sell-Outs • SBC Will Keep AT&T Name • Consumer Groups Oppose Big Telco Mergers • SBC Buys AT&T • AT&T Will Pay Refunds to New Yorkers • AT&T Will Pull Out of 7 States • AT&T Teams With Sprint to Return to Wireless Business • Minnesota Sues AT&T • Class Action Charges AT&T With Slamming • Another AT&T Rate Hike • AT&T Hiking Minimum Fees • AT&T Faces $780,000 Do-Not-Call Fine • AT&T Will Run Do-Not-Call List • Supreme Court Denies AT&T's Appeal of Arbitration Ruling

The two deals, totaling more than $24 billion, come close to putting the telephone industry back together again.

It was a Justice Department antitrust suit that, back in 1984, led a federal judge to order the break-up of AT&T into separate long-distance and local units. Now the two biggest long-distance carriers will be owned by the two biggest local companies, which have already devoured most of the other "Baby Bells."

The only thing that has changed is that the telephone business isn't what it used to be. Consumers are choosing wireless over wired phones and millions more are getting their phone service from their cable television provider.

SBC is hoping the AT&T name helps it sell more data transmission and long-distance service to big business customers. Verizon's purchase of MCI is seen as largely defensive; if SBC has a long-distance company, this reasoning goes, then Verizon needs one too. Never mind that both companies already successfully sell long-distance service to their customers.

To protect competition, the Justice Department said it will require both Verizon and SBC to sell some high-volume business lines in 19 cities where it found significant antitrust problems.

The FCC is likely to make a few stipulations as well, intended mostly to protect consumers and ensure open Internet access.

Major business customers aren't jumping with joy over the deal, which they think is almost certain to raise prices.

The Justice Department is requiring the companies to divest their connections to more than 350 buildings in such major markets as New York, Washington and Los Angeles. The FCC may require the companies to sell Internet access to customers who don't have traditional local telephone service.

Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.

Follow us on Twitter.

Back to the top |