|
|
CONSUMER NEWS
RECALLS
COMPLAINT FORM
SCAM ALERTS
Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws FAQ Newsletters |
|
|
![]() |
Portable Phones, Portable Numbers |
|||
|
June 7, 2003
An appeals court in Washington upheld the Federal Communications Commission regulation, which takes effect Nov. 24. Some members of Congress, under heavy lobbying by the cell-phone industry, have said they may seek to postpone the rule. Mobile-phone companies say the so-called number portability rule will cost the industry $1 billion to upgrade their networks, plus $500 million a year. They say the fact that millions of customers switch carriers each month without number potability proves it isn't needed. At an April hearing, judges on the appeals court were skeptical and said they doubted claims that the phone number rule isn't necessary to protect consumers. "The simple truth is that having to change phone numbers presents a barrier to switching carriers, even if not a total barrier, since consumers cannot compare and choose between various service plans and options as efficiently," Judge Harry Edwards wrote for the three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. The Federal Communications enacted a rule requiring number portability in 1996. Verizon Wireless and the cell phone's trade association -- the Cellular Telecommunications and Internet Association -- challenged the rule in court. Association President Tom Wheeler said his group is disappointed by the decision and said the FCC will now have to define "basic how-tos" involving number portability. Verizon said it will not appeal the court's decision but called it "bad public policy" and said the rule will divert resources from improving network quality, customer service and developing new products. There are about 146 million U.S. mobile phone users, or about half the population. At the six largest U.S. cellular operators, an average 2.5 percent of customers disconnect their service each month, which amounts to several million people. |
|||
Back to the top | News |
||||
Advertisement
|
|
||||
|
AUTOMOTIVE Dealers Manufacturers Service Extended Warranties Lemon Laws Recalls Tires Transporters FAMILY Aging Children, Parenting Recalls Dating Education Entertainment Pets Weddings |
FINANCE Annuities Banks Credit Cards Debt Collection Debt Counseling Insurance Investing Loans Mortgages Payday Loans Student Loans Tax Prep HEALTH Drugs, Pharmacies Health Clubs Hearing Care Hospitals Nursing Homes Nutrition, Diets Vision Care Weight Loss |
HOMEOWNERS & RENTERS Appliances Cookware Furniture Home Improvements Lawn & Garden Movers Pools & Spas Realtors, Rental Agents Recalls Utilities ELECTRONICS Cable TV/DBS Cameras Cell Phones Computers Home Electronics Internet Access Local Phone Service Long Distance VoIP |
SHOPPING In-Home Online Retail Stores Sporting Goods Supermarkets Telemarketers TRAVEL Airlines Bus Lines Car Rental Cruises Hotels Travel Agents Trains RESOURCES Class Actions Complaint Form Small Claims Guide Lemon Laws |
CONSUMER NEWS Latest News Automotive Telecom Financial Health Homeowners Scams Seniors Travel More ... RECALLS Automotive Children's Products Drugs Food Household Products Sporting Goods ABOUT US FAQ Privacy Policy Advertise With Us Newsroom Syndication Terms of Use |
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|