|
|
CONSUMER NEWS
RECALLS
COMPLAINT FORM
SCAM ALERTS
Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws FAQ Newsletters |
|
|
![]() |
Consumer Checks Issued in
|
||||
|
Subprime Loan Victims to Receive Consumer Redress
Some 20,000 borrowers who obtained home mortgage loans through First Alliance will receive a portion of the loan origination fees charged them by the company, while about 8,000 borrowers who previously released their rights against First Alliance in a separate action will receive $500 each. The company had been accused of using misleading telemarketing pitches to reap hidden fees from borrowers who couldn't qualify for conventional loans. In some cases, First Alliance foreclosed on the homes of elderly and the poor, many of whom did not understand the terms of their loan agreements. Other borrowers believed they were getting a low fixed-rate mortgage only to discover they received an adjustable-rate loan with balloon payments and prepayment penalties. According to the settlement, reached as part of a joint effort by the Federal Trade Commission, state agencies, AARP, and private plaintiffs, the consumer redress pool will receive additional funds as certain legal proceedings involving First Alliance are resolved. The 20,000 consumers receiving an initial refund this week can expect additional compensation in 2003 once those funds are received. The additional funds are expected to bring total consumer redress to about $60 million. First Alliance, headquartered in Irvine, California, offered home loans, usually secured by first mortgages, in eighteen states and the District of Columbia. The company marketed its loans to the "subprime" market, which includes homeowners with poor credit ratings who may not be able to qualify for conventional loans. Brian Chisick founded First Alliance and served as its CEO, Chairman of the Board and President. The FTC sued First Alliance in October 2000, charging that the company violated federal and state laws by deceptively offering home mortgage loans to consumers, and later added Brian Chisick as a defendant and his wife Sarah as a relief defendant. In May 2001, the United States Federal District Court for the Central District of California consolidated the FTC's action with complaints against First Alliance that were previously filed by various states, AARP, and certain private parties. In March 2002, First Alliance and the Chisicks agreed to settle the charges. The settlement was approved by the federal district court on September 9, 2002. The checks being mailed beginning today implement the consumer redress provisions of the settlement. |
||||
Back to the top | |
|||||
Advertisement
|
|
||||
|
AUTOMOTIVE Dealers Manufacturers Service Extended Warranties Lemon Laws Recalls Tires Transporters FAMILY Aging Children, Parenting Recalls Dating Education Entertainment Pets Weddings |
FINANCE Annuities Banks Credit Cards Debt Collection Debt Counseling Insurance Investing Loans Mortgages Payday Loans Student Loans Tax Prep HEALTH Drugs, Pharmacies Health Clubs Hearing Care Hospitals Nursing Homes Nutrition, Diets Vision Care Weight Loss |
HOMEOWNERS & RENTERS Appliances Cookware Furniture Home Improvements Lawn & Garden Movers Pools & Spas Realtors, Rental Agents Recalls Utilities ELECTRONICS Cable TV/DBS Cameras Cell Phones Computers Home Electronics Internet Access Local Phone Service Long Distance VoIP |
SHOPPING In-Home Online Retail Stores Sporting Goods Supermarkets Telemarketers TRAVEL Airlines Bus Lines Car Rental Cruises Hotels Travel Agents Trains RESOURCES Class Actions Complaint Form Small Claims Guide Lemon Laws |
CONSUMER NEWS Latest News Automotive Telecom Financial Health Homeowners Scams Seniors Travel More ... RECALLS Automotive Children's Products Drugs Food Household Products Sporting Goods ABOUT US FAQ Privacy Policy Advertise With Us Newsroom Syndication Terms of Use |
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|