|
|
NEWS
RECALLS
COMPLAINT FORM
SCAM ALERTS
RESOURCES
Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws FAQ Newsletters |
|
| Automotive Education Employment Electronics Family Finance Health Homeowners Insurance Pets Shopping Travel |
|
|
|
![]() |
Insurers Deny Daewoo Coverage |
||||
|
The news just keeps getting worse for Daewoo owners. A growing number of insurance companies are refusing to write collision policies for the Korean orphans. That means Daewoo owners will have fewer choices and most will wind up paying higher rates for collision coverage. The shortage of Daewoo parts is to blame for the insurers' decision. With Daewoo in bankruptcy and its assets taken over by General Motors, the shortage of parts has reportedly become critical in many sections of the country. That means damaged cars are nearly impossible to repair and are thus an unacceptable risk for insurance companies. Insurers will still write personal injury and liability insurance because, in most states, they're required to do so. But consumers who financed their car purchase may be in violation of the terms of their loan if they drive without collision coverage. They're also taking a risk that they will wind up owing thousands of dollars on a car that is no longer driveable. Allstate and State Farm, which together write about a quarter of all auto insurance in the U.S., say they are still issuing policies for Daewoos but are raising their rates. Companies declining to provide coverage include Liberty Mutual, the nation's eighth largest. Meanwhile, the parts situation may improve shortly. Daewoo Motor America's parent company and General Motors are forming a new company to take over Daewoo's manufacturing assets and to manage parts distribution in the U.S. Warranty problems may also be improving. Dealers have been refusing to do repairs because they say they are not being reimbursed for warranty work. But now, warranty funds will be coming from a trust fund established by Daewoo Motor Co. and monitored by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central Disstrict of California in Los Angeles. Some dealers have sued GM, claiming it is responsible for covering warranty repairs. But GM denies any such responsibility and insists the trust fund will be adequate. |
||||
Back to the top | |
|||||
Advertisement
|
|
Custom Search
|
||||
|
AUTOMOTIVE Dealers Manufacturers Service Extended Warranties Lemon Laws Recalls Tires Transporters FAMILY Aging Children, Parenting Recalls Dating Education Entertainment Pets Weddings |
FINANCE Annuities Banks Credit Cards Debt Collection Debt Counseling Insurance Investing Loans Mortgages Payday Loans Student Loans Tax Prep HEALTH Doctors Drugs, Pharmacies Health Clubs Hearing Care Hospitals Nursing Homes Nutrition, Diets Vision Care Weight Loss |
HOUSE & HOME Appliances Cookware Furniture Home Improvements Lawn & Garden Movers Pools & Spas Realtors, Rental Agents Recalls Utilities ELECTRONICS Cable TV/DBS Cameras Cell Phones Computers Home Electronics Internet Access Local Phone Service Long Distance VoIP |
SHOPPING In-Home Online Retail Stores Sporting Goods Supermarkets Telemarketers TRAVEL Airlines Bus Lines Car Rental Cruises Hotels Travel Agents Trains RESOURCES Class Actions Complaint Form Small Claims Guide Lemon Laws |
CONSUMER NEWS Latest News Automotive Telecom Financial Health Homeowners Scams Seniors Travel More ... RECALLS Automotive Children's Products Drugs Food Household Products Sporting Goods ABOUT US FAQ Privacy Policy Advertise With Us Newsroom Syndication Terms of Use |
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2010 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|