|
|
NEWS
RECALLS
COMPLAINT FORM
SCAM ALERTS
RESOURCES
Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws FAQ Newsletters |
Share |
| Automotive Education Employment Electronics Family Finance Health Homeowners Insurance Pets Shopping Travel |
|
|
|
![]() |
Canadian Boilerroom Charged
|
|||
|
WASHINGTON, April 9, 2002 -- Consumer Alliance, an operation based in Ontario, Canada, has been charged with deceptively marketing worthless credit-card protection programs to U.S. consumers. The Federal Trade Commission also alleges that the defendants telephoned consumers and offered low interest credit cards, but never provided consumers with a credit card. According to the FTC, the defendants also placed unauthorized charges on the credit cards of many U.S. consumers. The Commission is asking the court to issue an injunction permanently halting the deceptive claims and requiring that the defendants pay consumer redress. According to the FTC, the defendants used Canadian boilerrooms to offer credit card protection to U.S. consumers. During the sales pitch, the defendants' telemarketers allegedly misled consumers by saying that:
The complaint alleges that the defendants purposely misrepresented their affiliation with a credit card issuer, and tricked consumers into divulging their credit card numbers by stating that they already knew the numbers but needed verification, and then used the information to bill the consumer's credit card without authorization. In addition, the complaint alleges that in other calls the defendants' telemarketers promised U.S. consumers a credit card with a low interest rate, or a low interest rate on the consumers' existing credit card, in exchange for a $349 or $399 fee. In fact, according to the FTC, those consumers only received a list of banks to which they could apply for credit cards. The FTC's complaint alleges that the defendants violated Section 5 of the FTC Act and the Telemarketing Sales Rule (TSR) by, among other things, misrepresenting the cost of their programs and billing consumers without authorization. The FTC's complaint names three corporations -- Consumer Alliance, Inc., a Delaware corporation; Consumer Alliance, Inc., [also known as 1421914 Ontario Inc.], a Canadian corporation; and Biosource Financial, Inc. Also named are several officers and employees. The Commission investigated this case in conjunction with the Ontario Provincial Police, Anti-Rackets Section, which has filed criminal charges against some of the defendants. |
|||
Back to the top | Consumer News | ||||
Advertisement
|
|
Custom Search
|
||||
|
AUTOMOTIVE Dealers Manufacturers Service Extended Warranties Lemon Laws Recalls Tires Transporters FAMILY Aging Children, Parenting Recalls Dating Education Entertainment Pets Weddings |
FINANCE Annuities Banks Credit Cards Debt Collection Debt Counseling Insurance Investing Loans Mortgages Payday Loans Student Loans Tax Prep HEALTH Doctors Drugs, Pharmacies Health Clubs Hearing Care Hospitals Nursing Homes Nutrition, Diets Vision Care Weight Loss |
HOUSE & HOME Appliances Cookware Furniture Home Improvements Lawn & Garden Movers Pools & Spas Realtors, Rental Agents Recalls Utilities ELECTRONICS Cable TV/DBS Cameras Cell Phones Computers Home Electronics Internet Access Local Phone Service Long Distance VoIP |
SHOPPING In-Home Online Retail Stores Sporting Goods Supermarkets Telemarketers TRAVEL Airlines Bus Lines Car Rental Cruises Hotels Travel Agents Trains RESOURCES Class Actions Complaint Form Small Claims Guide Lemon Laws |
CONSUMER NEWS Latest News Automotive Telecom Financial Health Homeowners Scams Seniors Travel More ... RECALLS Automotive Children's Products Drugs Food Household Products Sporting Goods ABOUT US FAQ Privacy Policy Advertise With Us Newsroom Syndication Terms of Use |
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2009 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|