Verizon Cleared to Offer Long-Distance in Massachusetts

April 14, 2001
The Washington Post reports that the Federal Communications Commission is about to allow Verizon to enter the long-distance telephone market in Massachusetts. Verizon already provides long-distance service in New York, as does SBC Communications in Texas, Oklahoma and Kansas. The FCC ruling is expected on Monday.

The Telecommunications Act of 1996 provides that the former Bell companies must effectively open their local markets to competition before being allowed into the long-distance business. Some consumer advocates and competing carriers are protesting the FCC's action, which they say will reduce rather than foster competition.

"They're dead wrong," said ConsumerAffairs.com President James R. Hood. "The would-be competitors have had five years to build out their local networks. Instead of investing in infrastructure they've invested in lawyers and lobbyists, hoping to get a free ride on the Bell companies' networks."

Allowing Verizon and the other former Bells into the long-distance markets will provide consumers with the one-stop shopping the vast majority say they want, Hood said, and will reduce the confusion that now exists in the marketplace.

Others disagreed. Gene Kimmelman, co-director of the Washington office of Consumers Union, said the FCC decision "sends the signal that local telephone monopolies do not have to fully break apart their monopolies."

"Verizon reminds me of the high school senior who has still never learned how to read yet obtains a social promotion," Jonathan Askin, general counsel of Local Telecommunications Services, a trade group for Bell competitors.

Most groups that represent Bell competitors are funded largely by AT&T, WorldCom and Sprint, who have the most to lose if the Bell companies are allowed into long-distance. The former Bells are expected to quickly gain 50 percent or more of long-distance business when they're allowed into the market, which spells big losses for the long-distance companies.

"The long-distance companies like to portray themselves as scrappy start-ups. In fact, they're like bulked-up, steroid-popping athletes. They've made big bucks for years, selling a service the Bells are perfectly capable of providing in a more convenient, more cost-efficient and less confusing way," Hood said.

Back to the top | Consumer News 2001

Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2009 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.    The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission.