|
|
NEWS
RECALLS
COMPLAINT FORM
SCAM ALERTS
RESOURCES
Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws FAQ Newsletters |
Share |
| Automotive Education Employment Electronics Family Finance Health Homeowners Insurance Pets Shopping Travel |
|
|
|
Television "Home Shopping" Retailer Settles FTC Charges That Advertising Claims Lacked Scientific Support; Will Offer Refunds |
||||
|
WASHINGTON, July 11, 2001 -- ValueVision International, Inc., the third largest television "home shopping" network retailer in the United States, has agreed to settle Federal Trade Commission charges that it aired advertisements for a variety of weight loss, cellulite treatment, and anti-hair loss products with claims it could not substantiate. ValueVision has agreed not to make health-related claims about any food, drug, dietary supplement, cellulite-treatment product or weight-loss program, unless it can back those claims with competent and reliable scientific evidence. ValueVision also has agreed to offer refunds to dissatisfied consumers who bought the products at issue from ValueVision. ValueVision, based in Eden Prairie, Minnesota, operates a cable television shopping service and markets a variety of consumer products principally through live, 24-hour per day television home shopping programming. ValueVision complements its television home shopping business by selling products through its Internet website (vvtv.com). Through its affiliation with the National Broadcasting Company, Inc. (NBC), ValueVision is now known as ShopNBC, and its website address has changed to ShopNBC.com. "Consumers use advertising to help them make purchasing decisions, and they expect accuracy and truthfulness in product claims," said Howard Beales, Director of the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection. "Whether marketing online, in brick and mortar stores, or on television, retailers are responsible for being able to back up the claims they make for their products." The FTC complaint alleges that ValueVision made health-related claims about the following five products without competent and reliable scientific evidence to support those claims:
Under the terms of the proposed consent agreement, ValueVision would be barred from engaging in similar acts or practices in the future. ValueVision could not make any unsubstantiated claim (a claim lacking competent and reliable scientific evidence) that the WeightPerfect Fat Loss Accelerators, Fight the Fat, NutriFirm Perfect Body Solution, or any other food, drug, dietary supplement, or cosmetic: causes substantial weight loss or fat loss; causes substantial loss in body weight or body fat without exercise or restrictions on caloric intake; prevents weight gain, regardless of exercise or caloric intake; increases metabolic rate or burns calories; reduces or eliminates cellulite; suppresses the appetite; causes substantial loss in body weight or body fat while sleeping; prevents the human body from absorbing fat; or enables consumers to lose weight even if consumers eat foods that are high in fat, including steaks, pizza, hamburgers, butter, fried chicken, or chocolate. The proposed order also would bar ValueVision from making unsubstantiated claims that NutriFirm Internal Cleanser, or any other food, drug, dietary supplement or cosmetic, alleviates backaches, muscle aches or headaches; alleviates colds, influenza or allergies; or improves impaired memory. In addition, the order would prohibit unsubstantiated claims that NutriFirm Vitamin H Serum, or any other food, drug, dietary supplement or cosmetic, prevents or slows the rate of hair-loss, including hair-loss in women after pregnancy. The proposed order also would require ValueVision to have competent and reliable scientific evidence for any claims that any food, drug, dietary supplement, cellulite-treatment product or weight-loss program can or will cure, treat, or prevent disease, or will have any effect on the structure or function of the human body. The proposed settlement would allow ValueVision to make certain claims for drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration or food or dietary supplement claims that are permitted by statute. Finally, the proposed order would require ValueVision to send a letter to all purchasers who bought any of the five products through ValueVision since February 1, 2000. The letter would offer a complete refund for up to three bottles of the product, including shipping and handling charges, to those consumers who were dissatisfied. |
|||
Back to the top | | ||||
Advertisement
|
|
Custom Search
|
||||
|
AUTOMOTIVE Dealers Manufacturers Service Extended Warranties Lemon Laws Recalls Tires Transporters FAMILY Aging Children, Parenting Recalls Dating Education Entertainment Pets Weddings |
FINANCE Annuities Banks Credit Cards Debt Collection Debt Counseling Insurance Investing Loans Mortgages Payday Loans Student Loans Tax Prep HEALTH Doctors Drugs, Pharmacies Health Clubs Hearing Care Hospitals Nursing Homes Nutrition, Diets Vision Care Weight Loss |
HOUSE & HOME Appliances Cookware Furniture Home Improvements Lawn & Garden Movers Pools & Spas Realtors, Rental Agents Recalls Utilities ELECTRONICS Cable TV/DBS Cameras Cell Phones Computers Home Electronics Internet Access Local Phone Service Long Distance VoIP |
SHOPPING In-Home Online Retail Stores Sporting Goods Supermarkets Telemarketers TRAVEL Airlines Bus Lines Car Rental Cruises Hotels Travel Agents Trains RESOURCES Class Actions Complaint Form Small Claims Guide Lemon Laws |
CONSUMER NEWS Latest News Automotive Telecom Financial Health Homeowners Scams Seniors Travel More ... RECALLS Automotive Children's Products Drugs Food Household Products Sporting Goods ABOUT US FAQ Privacy Policy Advertise With Us Newsroom Syndication Terms of Use |
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2009 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|