|
|
NEWS
RECALLS
COMPLAINT FORM
SCAM ALERTS
RESOURCES
Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws FAQ Newsletters |
| Automotive Education Employment Electronics Family Finance Health Homeowners Pets Shopping Travel |
|
|
Fleet, Citigroup, MBNA Impose
|
|||||||||||||
|
May 11, 2001
Other large banks are following suit. Citigroup Inc. and MBNA Corp. are also issuing new cardholder agreements that prohibit their customers from suing them, requiring them to submit all disputes to binding arbitration. The new agreements also say consumers are barred from banding together to bring a class-action suit, the traditional way of handling a large number of relatively small claims. The sweeping actions will, if successful, disqualify millions of consumers from exercising their constitutional right to sue. Whether the courts will uphold the banks' action is open to question. In a similar case in 1998, a Portland, Ore., judge threw out a similar clause imposed by Bank One Corp.'s First USA Division. Legal scholars say it's unclear whether businesses have the power to prohibit class-action lawsuits by unilaterally altering an agreement. Fleet's motivation is clear. It's already fighting more than a dozen lawsuits seeking certification as class actions. Most of the pending actions accuse Fleet of misleading customers about interest rates. In Florida, a federal suit has been filed contesting the retroactive clause, among other issues. And a similar suit was filed recently in state court contesting similar clauses imposed by MBNA and First Union Corp. |
|
|||||||||||
Back to the top | Consumer News 2001 | |||||||||||||
|
|
Custom Search
|
||||
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2009 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|