1. Skip to navigation
  2. Skip to content
  3. Skip to sidebar




PhotoFord got a lot of favorable reviews and rave notices when it launched its C-MAX and Fusion hybrids. Reviewers gave the cars high marks for handling, fit and finish and all those other good things, and everyone pretty much accepted the 47 mile-per-gallon estimates that showed up on the window stickers.

But some of that good feeling has rubbed off as consumers have actually gotten their hands on the cars.

"I thought my 2013 C-MAX would be a Prius Killer? NOT! As a returning Ford buyer I feel deceived," said Ronald of South Portland, Maine. "Based on the advertised EPA estimates, I would have been ok with low 40's but 28-33 mpg is not even in the ballpark."

Ron is not the only one complaining. Consumer Reports magazine tested both the C-Max and Fusion and said they both came in well short of the claimed 47 mpg fuel efficiency. The C-Max achieved 37 mpg, the Fusion 39 in the magazine's tests.

"These two vehicles have the largest discrepancy between our overall-mpg results and the estimates published by the EPA that we've seen among any current models," Consumer Reports said in a statement.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), which determines the mpg ratings, has said it is confident the 47 mpg finding is sound but has said it will review the ratings of both Ford vehicles, the Detroit News reported.

Ford's President of the Americas Joe Hinrichs has defended the fuel efficiency claims, saying Ford followed the EPA's rules.

Don't blame EPA

PhotoBut consumers like Ronald aren't content to let the EPA take the rap.

"This is not an issue about EPA testing standards, but rather an issue about setting false customer expectations in order to promote sales," Ronald says in an open letter to Ford that he shared with ConsumerAffairs. "Ford's 47 mpg marketing campaign tarnished what should have been the roll-out of a truly remarkable vehicle, the C-Max."

Ronald also faults the dealer who sold him the car, Yankee Ford. He said service personnel there have accused him of not knowing have to drive a hybrid.

"For the record, during the last three years I have leased both a 2010 Prius and 2010 Honda Insight Hybrid, and consider myself an experienced hyper-miler. My mileage in the Prius is 50 plus, the Insight is 40 plus," he said. "Is there a difference how I drive Prius Hybrid vs. the CMAX hybrid? I think we all know the answer to that."

Ronald added that he had just returned from a trip to San Francisco, where the driver of a DeSoto Cab said he was averaging about 30 mpg as well.

Out for a spin

After reading Ron's complaint, we jumped in the car and hustled over to Ted Britt Ford in Fairfax, Va., where an obliging salesman soon had us whirring down Lee Jackson Memorial Highway in a new C-Max.

It is indeed a spiffy little car, with impressive handling, braking, acceleration and so forth.  By chance, we had been confined in a Prius just a few days before and found it to be like driving a tin box on roller skates. In our brief spin, we found the C-Max equivalent to the Volkswagen Tiguan that is our current family cruiser.

"But what about the mileage?" we asked. "I've read that some people aren't getting 47 miles per gallon."

"Oh, that is when the car is new. You have to drive it about 5,000 miles before you start getting the 47 mpg," the salesman replied, perhaps hoping he would be 5,000 miles away by the time we had run the odometer up to that point.

Ronald, for the record, has 4,400 miles on his C-Max, so perhaps things will soon turn around for him, although we're not holding our breath.

Who's right? It may be too soon to say. There aren't many owner reviews, positive or negative, yet. There has been at least one class action suit filed in California, claiming Ford's ads are deceptive but we may all be too old to drive by the time it and similar suits are settled.

Meanwhile, consumers are snapping these cars up. The C-Max broke launch records in October and November 2012, selling 8,030 units, making it the highest-selling hybrid ever in its first two months. As those cars roll up the miles, we'll no doubt be hearing about the new owners' experiences, good and bad. Until then, if you're looking for an ultra-high-mileage vehicle, you might want to wait and let the mpg dispute play itself out.


Share your Comments

Please enable javascript to comment on this page
Jesse Maiolo
If anybody would have bothered to watch AUTOWEEK on TV or read consumer reports or the various other car magazines that tested the so called 47 mpg FUSION they would have learned, as I did, that the best that car did was 32 overall MPG's.Not bad for a big car, but not even close to the 47 claimed.I blame THE EPA and their ridiculous methods of calculations that force manufacturers to claim these idiotic numbers when they are not true in the real world and I also think FORD had to know that unless you're rolling downhill, in neutral, You are never going to see 47 mpg's unless you put a sail on the roof of these cars! They aren't alone in the miscalculations though, other manufacturers fall victim to erroneous mpg numbers.Hey EPA, HOW ABOUT YOU GET YOUR SORRY BUTTS OUT IN THE REAL WORLD WITH THESE CARS AND FIND OUT WHAT THEY REALLY GET FOR MILEAGE? Dump the machines you're using, for a change.Let's see how much this costs FORD! Hyundai wwill probably shell out 100 million for their miscalculation and it wasn't anywhere near as far off as FORD's was..
Gene Lynch
WE had a Honda CVCC made in the 70s and it averaged 42 MPG highway and approx. 30 MPG in town. Why can't the hybred do better than that I wonder?
Gene Lynch
WE had a Honda CVCC made in the 70s and it averaged 42 MPG highway and approx. 30 MPG in town. Why can't the hybred do better than that I wonder?
Todd Heide
I have a 2013 Fusion Hybrid, it is getting 34.9 MPG, while my 2010 Fusion Hybrid is getting 37. 2013 47 Combined, 2010 Fusion 39 Combined. These are winter numbers, so factor in some cold losses. So for 2010 2 MPG cold loss, 2013 12 MPG cold loss. Out of all the Hybrids I drove, which includes 2 Prius, 2 Camry Hybrids and an Avalon Hybrid, the new Ford has the WORST cold losses of any hybrid on the road today. What is worse, the one I got fouled all 4 spark plugs with carbon at 4500 miles, no explanation from Ford as to why. However, when I drove the car in Florida in 70* weather, it still did rather poorly, so I have my doubts the 12 MPG loss has anything to do with the cold weather. As a side note, when I took a brand new Toyota Avalon Hybrid out for a road test, I got the high EPA rating on that test, did the same in a Camry Hybrid, but neither the Cmax nor the Fusion were coming even close to the EPA numbers in the road tests. Why is it you can take a Toyota fresh off the truck and hit EPA numbers, and yet you cant even come close in the Fords, even with 8200 miles on them?
Kenneth Cho
I have owned a 2013 Ford Fusion Hybrid and the sales experience was as usual. Same sales pitches then I hear "47mpg" thinking, WOW this is awesome. The awesome turned to bitterness when I could never get past 37mpg. Driving below the speed limit, accelerating as slow as a snail, meeting all of Fords "Coaching System" at near 100%. So I take my car to the Koons Ford in Sterling and stand there waiting as 10 service guys are chatting it up. Me, patiently waiting for my appointment. After 10 minutes someone says "oh do you need help?" (sarcasm here). After waiting for them to test they came back with clean bill of health on the car and that I needed to drive correctly and not turn on the heater or anything that will drain the battery. However ridiculous that was I tried that. I turned off everything... ac/heater, seat warmer, blind side monitoring, auto high beam, collision assist...etc. Anything that had an OFF switch I turned off. The difference in MPG? Absolutely ZERO. The second visit to good ole Koons Ford was no different, people chatting away and no one greeting me to see if I need help. I HAVE AN APPOINTMENT FOOLS! Anyways the service guy that I dealt with was actually very nice and he did contact Ford to see what could be done. Fords response was that I needed to hit my break-in period of 3000 miles. Fine I will driving on some long trips to get the mileage marker to see if things are better. 3000 miles comes and no improvement. This time Ford says that its cold outside so you won't see anything close to 47mpg. If Ford wants to blame the cold then why are people in sunny higher temperature climates having the same poor mpg? I do see that the cold has a BIG affect on this car but losing 20+% fuel economy just because its cold? I contact Ford and ask them to buy back the vehicle because I'm only getting 4/5 or less of the car that I purchased or ill take a 6600 refund since I paid 33k for the car. Ford says that's not possible. Great! thanks for deceiving me with your 47/47/47mpg advertisements and thanks for not giving a darn and doing anything to help. Ford will pay a heavy price for deceiving consumers.
Craig Casey
I have a 2013 Ford Fusion Hybrid with over 5000 miles on it. On warm days I routinely get over 50 MPG during my 38 mile commute home. Lifetime for the car I am averaging 44.2 MPG. My worst tank averaged 41 MPG and my best tank averaged 46.7 MPG. I fully anticipate that when the colder temperatures end I will routinely meet or beat the 47 MPG EPA rating.
Craig Casey
I have a 2013 Ford Fusion Hybrid with over 5000 miles on it. On warm days I routinely get over 50 MPG during my 38 mile commute home. Lifetime for the car I am averaging 44.2 MPG. My worst tank averaged 41 MPG and my best tank averaged 46.7 MPG. I fully anticipate that when the colder temperatures end I will routinely meet or beat the 47 MPG EPA rating.
Bijan Amini
I own a 2013 CMAX SEL with just over 12K miles on it (I bought it because I drive a lot). The car handles great, has good power, very comfortable and the features are make the car real fun to drive. I currently get 34.4 MPG (per dashboard reading), and when I took it in for service, Ford hooked my car up to their IDS system (not sure what that is) and got 39 MPG. I got the same song and dance about gas formulas in the winter, etc. The car is really fun to drive, but the 47 MPG is not applicable to real world conditions. I did some research and found that the EPA tests don't take hybrids over 60 MPH on their freeway testing, and the average speed is 48 MPH. The CMAX goes up to 62 MPH in electric mode, so needless to say it can perform well on the EPA test, and get much lower results in the real world. I will definitely do more research the next time I buy a car. It's unfortunate that is no merit in what is advertised, whosoever fault it may be.
Bijan Amini
I own a 2013 CMAX SEL with just over 12K miles on it (I bought it because I drive a lot). The car handles great, has good power, very comfortable and the features are make the car real fun to drive. I currently get 34.4 MPG (per dashboard reading), and when I took it in for service, Ford hooked my car up to their IDS system (not sure what that is) and got 39 MPG. I got the same song and dance about gas formulas in the winter, etc. The car is really fun to drive, but the 47 MPG is not applicable to real world conditions. I did some research and found that the EPA tests don't take hybrids over 60 MPH on their freeway testing, and the average speed is 48 MPH. The CMAX goes up to 62 MPH in electric mode, so needless to say it can perform well on the EPA test, and get much lower results in the real world. I will definitely do more research the next time I buy a car. It's unfortunate that is no merit in what is advertised, whosoever fault it may be.
Darci Thelaner
I'm thinking about buying a C-Max SEL, but this is very discouraging. Could this act as a way of negotiating prices?
Darci Thelaner
I'm thinking about buying a C-Max SEL, but this is very discouraging. Could this act as a way of negotiating prices?
John Wheeler
I purchased my C-MAx in October, and now with 8300 miles and warming temperatures, and not the best driving in the book, my last tank average was 39.8. I love the style and handling and my gas is much improved from my previous vehicle. I do feel ripped off with the MPG claims, but I am still very satisfied with my purchase, and hope as time continues to pass that it will gradually improve.
Paul W. Cashman
I'm assuming this was taken into account, but could transmission type be an issue? My 2011 Ford Focus 5-speed manual (at around $18,000) routinely gets 38mpg during summer....right now in winter it's averaging 35.5, in mostly freeway but some side-roads driving.
Janet Fales
This is just a FYI next year cars will be having a black box in them! This little box will be able to tell how many people are in your car, how fast you are traveling etc. of course this is for your safety and doesn't have anything to do with an insurance company! HA
Bt Sawyer
I owned a Prius for 3 yrs and 9 months up until I got a Ford C-Max hybrid in November. My MPG for the Prius was 49 MPG for approx 49K miles. I just had a 5K mile servicing for the C-Max and for 5,319 miles I burned 147 girl of gas for an MPG of 35.7. The car reported 37.6 but I have a record of gallon I put in the car and the actual fill-up is about 0.5 girl more than what the C-Max says. The "get used to the style of driving" is bulls---. I know how to drive a hybrid. My "score" is 85% on the C-Max scale. Ford (& the EPA) are cheating us. Anyone know where there is a class action suit?
Quantcast