CONSUMER NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS  


Complain about a product or service

Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish
Automotive    Education    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Shopping    Travel   
NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

Epic Resorts Ordered to Pay Refunds



WASHINGTON, Sept. 5, 2001 --Many consumers who bought travel packages from Epic Resorts and its subsidiary Epic Travel will be getting refunds within the next few weeks, under the terms of a settlement with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Under the order, the companies are required to refund the money of customers who requested, but did not receive, their refunds within a 30-day cancellation period.

The Commission filed its complaint in U.S. District Court in Florida against Epic Resorts and Epic Travel as part of the August 2000 "Operation Travel Unravel" law enforcement sweep of companies allegedly engaged in travel fraud and violations of the FTC Act and Telemarketing Sales Rule (TSR). The order also enjoins the defendants from failing to make required travel-related disclosures in the future and prohibits them from violating the "Do Not Call" provision of the TSR, as well as the Truth in Lending Act (TILA).

According to the Commission's complaint, Epic Resorts, Epic Travel, and the companies' owner and president, Thomas Flatley, violated the FTC Act and the TSR by misrepresenting that consumers had won or were specially selected to receive a vacation, misrepresenting the total cost of vacation packages, and failing to disclose material conditions and restrictions on the use of the packages.

In addition, the complaint alleged that the companies, which sent out unsolicited faxes and e-mails to consumers who had registered to win vacations, failed to disclose material costs and restrictions concerning the vacation packages before consumers paid for them, as required by the TSR. The company also was charged with violating the Rule's "Do Not Call" provision by continuing to call customers who had asked not to be contacted. The complaint marked the first time the Commission alleged a violation of the "Do Not Call" provision of the TSR.


Consumer News

July 24 2008

Recent Recalls & Safety Alerts

Print, mail, etc.




FREE CONSUMER NEWSLETTERS

The Daily Consumer
Afternoons M-F

Sign up now!


Consumer News & Alerts
Every Sunday

Sign up now!


Knowledge is free.
Knowledge is power.

Back to the top | Consumer News



Advertisement


Home | Rogues Gallery | Good Guys | Complaint Form | News | Recalls | Search | Video | FAQ |
Consumer Resources | Small Claims Guide | Lemon Law | Newsletter | Contact Us
Advertise With Us | Testimonials | Newsroom | RSS Feeds | Radio | Job Postings




Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.