|
|
NEWS
RECALLS
COMPLAINT FORM
SCAM ALERTS
RESOURCES
Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws FAQ Newsletters |
Share |
| Automotive Education Employment Electronics Family Finance Health Homeowners Insurance Pets Shopping Travel |
|
|
|
Reader's Digest Pays $6 Million to Settle Sweepstakes Complaints |
|||||
|
In an agreement with 31 states and the District of Columbia, Reader's Digest Assn., Inc. will pay more than $6 million to settle charges by 31 states that its sweepstakes promotions were misleading to consumers. About $4 million of the settlement will go to 7,500 "high-activity" customers who spent more than $2,500 annually in 19998, 1999 or 2000, according to California Attorney General Bill Lockyer. The company will also pay $2 million in attorneys' fees and investigation costs. Reader's Digest publishes the world's most widely-read magazine. It claims a readership of more than 100 million readers per month for its 48 editions in 19 languages. It's the fifth in a series of settlements with major sweepstakes houses since 1999, when the state attorneys general held public hearings on sweepstakes competitions. Other companies that have settled include American Express Publishing Corp., Publishers Clearing House, Time Inc. (now AOL Time Warner) and US Sales Corp. Reader's Digest sends out million of sweepstakes entries each year, offering subscriptions to its various magazines, books and tapes. Lockyer said that under the settlement, Reader's Digest has agreed not to exaggerate a contestant's chances of winning and not to suggest that a contestant is "about to become a winner." "Consumers will be able to clearly see that buying products will not improve their chances of winning," Lockyer said. Federal and many state laws require that sweepstakes must treat all entrants equally -- and that entrants may not be required to purchase anything or be present at a specific place and time. Or, as New Jersey Attorney General John J. Farmer Jr. put it: "You don't have to pay to play." Last year, a Reader's Digest spokesman said that about 47% of new subscriptions for its magazines resulted from sweepstakes promotions, down from 89% the previous year. In a statement, Reader's Digest said it has reduced its reliance on sweepstakes but conceded it could see "short-term declines in response rates." "Reader's Digest has established a reputation for integrity and earned the trust of millions of customers over the past 78 years by delivering quality products and excellent service," Michael Brizel, the company's General Counsel, said. States covered in the settlement are:
|
||||
Back to the top | Consumer News 2001 | |||||
Advertisement
|
|
Custom Search
|
||||
|
AUTOMOTIVE Dealers Manufacturers Service Extended Warranties Lemon Laws Recalls Tires Transporters FAMILY Aging Children, Parenting Recalls Dating Education Entertainment Pets Weddings |
FINANCE Annuities Banks Credit Cards Debt Collection Debt Counseling Insurance Investing Loans Mortgages Payday Loans Student Loans Tax Prep HEALTH Doctors Drugs, Pharmacies Health Clubs Hearing Care Hospitals Nursing Homes Nutrition, Diets Vision Care Weight Loss |
HOUSE & HOME Appliances Cookware Furniture Home Improvements Lawn & Garden Movers Pools & Spas Realtors, Rental Agents Recalls Utilities ELECTRONICS Cable TV/DBS Cameras Cell Phones Computers Home Electronics Internet Access Local Phone Service Long Distance VoIP |
SHOPPING In-Home Online Retail Stores Sporting Goods Supermarkets Telemarketers TRAVEL Airlines Bus Lines Car Rental Cruises Hotels Travel Agents Trains RESOURCES Class Actions Complaint Form Small Claims Guide Lemon Laws |
CONSUMER NEWS Latest News Automotive Telecom Financial Health Homeowners Scams Seniors Travel More ... RECALLS Automotive Children's Products Drugs Food Household Products Sporting Goods ABOUT US FAQ Privacy Policy Advertise With Us Newsroom Syndication Terms of Use |
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2009 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|