1. Skip to navigation
  2. Skip to content
  3. Skip to sidebar




PhotoTechnically, the U.S. went over the fiscal cliff January 1 -- but most of the tax hikes were eliminated by subsequent legislation and automatic spending cuts have been delayed for two months. Meaning the fiscal can has been kicked a bit further down the road.

Despite a major split among House Republicans, enough went along with Democrats to approve an emergency Senate measure crafted by Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and Vice-President Joe Biden. Here's what it means:

For most taxpayers, rates remain the same. The legislation reset tax rates for those earning less than $400,000 a year, or couples earning less than $450,000 a year, to where they were after the Bush-era tax cuts -- enacted after the 9/11 terrorist attacks

Who pays?

For individuals earning $400,000 or more a year, and families earning $450,000 or more, the tax rate rises from 35 percent to 39.6 percent. In addition, the tax rate on investment income for those in that tax bracket also rises by five percent.

All employees, however, will see a slightly smaller paycheck from now on. That's because the temporary reduction in the payroll tax expired at the end of the year and the new legislation did not extend it.

The tax is 12.4 percent on wages up to $113,700, but employees only pay half of that; their employers pay the other half. Two years ago, in an effort to stimulate the economy, Congress temporarily reduced the employee portion of the tax from 6.2 to 4.2 percent. For the average family that amounted to about $1,000 a year, or $19 a week.

Few supporters of extending the payroll tax cut

Neither Republicans nor Democrats backed extending the tax cut further, since Social Security and Medicare benefits are supposedly based on what an employee has contributed to the system and both programs face severe shortfalls as it is.

The emergency legislation that passed the Congress was designed to prevent all tax rates from reverting to their pre-Bush tax cut levels. Economists warned that, with the fragile state of the economy, that would have brought on a recession.

The measure also extended provisions of the Farm Bill, preventing a huge spike in the price of milk. The measure extended present dairy policy, giving lawmakers more time to approve a new Farm Bill.

The bill did nothing to cut spending and, in fact, increases it by $4 trillion over the next 10 years, according to an analysis by the Congressional Budget Office. Lawmakers have said they will address spending in a separate measure and Thomas Donohue, president of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, says time is of the essence.

Focus now on spending

"The new Congress and the administration must begin work immediately to slow runaway spending through structural entitlement reforms,” Donohue said in a statement. “They must also spur faster economic growth through comprehensive tax reform and a rapid expansion of American energy, which would create jobs and generate government revenues. This is the only formula that can reduce budget deficits and control our unsustainable national debt.”

But that sets up new conflicts in Congress, all but guaranteeing another contentious encounter when lawmakers consider a measure next month to raise the debt ceiling.


Share your Comments

Please enable javascript to comment on this page
Terry Kauffman
The $400,000.00 income per year is relatively meaningless since according to sources listed above, 99% of all households make less than $374,000.00 and 95% of all households take in less than $150,000 per year. So what is the benefit of this argument? Is this the real issue or even a real solution? hardly. Not even close. For starters, my recommendations would be to cut spending by cutting subsidies to oil companies, utility companies and any company that the US government is giving huge tax breaks to stay here in the US. It is simply a con game (shell game) that they are playing with taxpayer’s income. A large number of these companies received the subsidy and still moved overseas. Just look at our old VP Chaney who moved his old corporation Halliburton to of all places Saudi Arabia. What will they do when all of the money is gone? When the 95% of all taxpayers are on some form of a government subsidy? Why not tax corporations, including oil companies that are getting tax subsidies from the State, local and federal government? At $40 billion profit per quarter, they do not need a subsidy from us especially with gas prices so overpriced. I am all in favor of suspending our elected leaders & all other government officials’ income until they resolve the crisis that they created for US citizens. In fact I am in favor of cutting all of their benefits as well. I am also in favor of max term limits for elected officials. 6 years max with no retirement plan other than social security if they pay in to it. They should not have a separate retirement plan funded by taxpayers and they should not have a better healthcare plan than what is available to taxpayers. It is also time to stop giving billions away to support terrorism in foreign countries. Example, we give Pakistan $2 billion per year for aid and they hide bin laden there for years. Think about it, he was the #1 most wanted terrorist in the world and now hilarious Hilary Clinton, (BJ"s wife) wants to increase the aid to $3 billion per year and they don't even like us. Just imagine the problems that could be resolved here in the US with the hundreds of billions of dollars our government is giving away in support of terrorism and foreign aid. Again it’s a shell game and we are the pawns. It’s time to cut back on all foreign aid (free money). What do we get for the billions that we give oil rich countries? What do we get for the hundreds of billions we give Israel, Pakistan... around the world? It is time for accountability of this foreign aid. It is time for accountability of and by by our elected officials. It is time to stop acting like play ground kids. saying he said, she said, pushing and shoving, and start acting like responsible mature, intelligent adults. Its time for our so called leaders to wake up and start representing our best interests. Regrettably, the "fiscal cliff" is not a new issue or occurrence. It is just a new political spin, "tag line of the week" which will be changed periodically to take the focus off of the really important issues that you may or may not be currently aware of yet. Wait for the other shoe to fall. We will always have so called "fiscal cliffs" as long as our elected officials (republicans & democrats) continue to act irresponsibly as they have been for decades.
Terry Kauffman
The $400,000.00 income per year is relatively meaningless since according to sources listed above, 99% of all households make less than $374,000.00 and 95% of all households take in less than $150,000 per year. So what is the benefit of this argument? Is this the real issue or even a real solution? hardly. Not even close. For starters, my recommendations would be to cut spending by cutting subsidies to oil companies, utility companies and any company that the US government is giving huge tax breaks to stay here in the US. It is simply a con game (shell game) that they are playing with taxpayer’s income. A large number of these companies received the subsidy and still moved overseas. Just look at our old VP Chaney who moved his old corporation Halliburton to of all places Saudi Arabia. What will they do when all of the money is gone? When the 95% of all taxpayers are on some form of a government subsidy? Why not tax corporations, including oil companies that are getting tax subsidies from the State, local and federal government? At $40 billion profit per quarter, they do not need a subsidy from us especially with gas prices so overpriced. I am all in favor of suspending our elected leaders & all other government officials’ income until they resolve the crisis that they created for US citizens. In fact I am in favor of cutting all of their benefits as well. I am also in favor of max term limits for elected officials. 6 years max with no retirement plan other than social security if they pay in to it. They should not have a separate retirement plan funded by taxpayers and they should not have a better healthcare plan than what is available to taxpayers. It is also time to stop giving billions away to support terrorism in foreign countries. Example, we give Pakistan $2 billion per year for aid and they hide bin laden there for years. Think about it, he was the #1 most wanted terrorist in the world and now hilarious Hilary Clinton, (BJ"s wife) wants to increase the aid to $3 billion per year and they don't even like us. Just imagine the problems that could be resolved here in the US with the hundreds of billions of dollars our government is giving away in support of terrorism and foreign aid. Again it’s a shell game and we are the pawns. It’s time to cut back on all foreign aid (free money). What do we get for the billions that we give oil rich countries? What do we get for the hundreds of billions we give Israel, Pakistan... around the world? It is time for accountability of this foreign aid. It is time for accountability of and by by our elected officials. It is time to stop acting like play ground kids. saying he said, she said, pushing and shoving, and start acting like responsible mature, intelligent adults. Its time for our so called leaders to wake up and start representing our best interests. Regrettably, the "fiscal cliff" is not a new issue or occurrence. It is just a new political spin, "tag line of the week" which will be changed periodically to take the focus off of the really important issues that you may or may not be currently aware of yet. Wait for the other shoe to fall. We will always have so called "fiscal cliffs" as long as our elected officials (republicans & democrats) continue to act irresponsibly as they have been for decades.
Susan Bullock
Amen Terry! You said it like it is. Thankfullty after being on "extended" unemployment for two years; I'm now working fulltime but still barely surviving...what I would give to get a small stipend of what these greedy corporate fools make.
Quantcast