
Suzanne of Oakdale, LA on May 23, 2011
I started out with Direcway but Hughesnet bought them out. The following is a rough estimate of what happened since I signed up for the satellite internet.
I initially signed up for Direcway satellite internet service back in 2002 (I am terrible with dates so I don't remember the exact month). There were issues with the installer being unprofessional. First of all, he did not arrive on the day (or even the week) of the scheduled installation. He didn't even arrive until 5:30 in the evening and he brought his cousin (who apparently lived somewhere in town). I live out in the woods down an unpaved road. I don't even get mail delivery out here.
My phone lines are so badly spliced by Bell South that dial-up won't even work. Instead of installing the satellite when he first arrived, the installer sat in his truck and chatted with his cousin for over 45 minutes. I presume because he hadn't seen him in a while-- but he was at work and should have done the socializing after the job. The installation was supposed to be free. They failed to mention that was only with the installation being on the roof-- it was $100 for a pole on the ground. When I saw the installation point, I asked the installer if the nearby power lines would be a problem.
He said they wouldn't. He drilled holes in the roof and placed the satellite. He then entered the house with his cousin. Lo and behold the internet would not work and he determined that the power lines were interfering so he had to put it on a pole. But he had wasted so much time that it was now dark and he couldn't see well enough to install it. He hadn't brought a pole with him and the only hardware stores in town were already closed. So he said he would come back another day to finish the installation.
I don't remember how many days were in between that, but the installer did not come back. Instead he sent his cousin to install a pole. Even though the installer didn't do the work he still charged $100 for a pole that was not worth nearly that much, used our cement instead of bringing his own, and didn't even install it properly. Our internet did not work for the first 3 weeks from the first date that it was allegedly installed. They started billing us when it was supposed to be installed but was not actually installed. Obviously at this time it was Direcway so that is water under the bridge.
Nothing in the contract said anything about the FAP and the installer said nothing about it. I had to learn about it while browsing online. Light rain, clouds, wind, and no bad weather at all seemed to stop the satellite from working. But it was better than the dial-up which I'd had (it was only 6.2mps when it actually worked- I had to cancel it bc it just stopped working after my neighbor tampered with the phone line box down the road). With the base plan of Direcway (which was about $59 a month) I was allowed 450mb per day and if I went over I would simply have to stop downloading for 4 to 6 hours and it would be restored. For the record my modem was a DW4000. It was a nuisance but it was manageable. Note: My signal strength was at 80-- I was told anything below 52 would prevent the internet from working at all.
Then along came Hughesnet which bought out Direcway and everything started to go downhill. The DW was never that fast or stable, but he FAP was not so bad. When Hughesnet bought it out they reduced the limit to 200mb per day and locked in the FAP for 26 hours. Tthey tell you it is only 24 but I kept track and every time they capped me for 26. At first the cap was just slower but I could still load webpages (although barely). Signal strength dropped to 70 instead of 80. When Hughesnet took over I was not given any paperwork to sign or sent any information to notify me of the changes in the service. I suppose it is legal for a new company to change the rules when they buy out an existing company but I wish there had been more notice and perhaps something for me to sign to say that I agreed to the changes or to have an option to get out of the contract without any penalty fee (not that backing out was even possible because there are no other options for me -- even dialup is not viable out here).
I should note that under Direcway, the software updates for the modem did NOT count toward our bandwidth usage but with Hughesnet the software updates did count-- and it kept miscalculating. Mind you we weren't downloading movies or music or any large files- but basic images and webpages were eating up bandwidth (it didn't help that bc the internet is so slow many sites timed out and had to be reloaded over and over to actually load all of the way). At one point when I tried to use the online chat tech support it timed out and I was unable to communicate with tech support in the chat bc the internet was so slow. The upload latency was absolutely abysmal (it was slower than dialup).
Over the years, I had to call tech support more times than I can remember. The service I got varied from very good and friendly to absolutely atrocious. At one point while I was having an issue the technician told me to unplug the modem from the power and leave it unplugged for several hours (bc it was miscalculating my usage and saying I loaded 50mb when I loaded 5mb--The miscalculating always seems to get the worst in April every year for the past several years.). When I finally got to speak with advanced tech support the technician was upset that I had unplugged the modem. He said that I shouldn't do that as the virtual "bucket" of bandwidth would not refill while it was off.
I told him I had only done what I was instructed to do and he was frustrated that I had been told that-- he said the lower level tech support guy in India was wrong. At a later date I called about the same issue and was told that I needed to unplug my modem for a few hours. I pointed out that advanced tech support told me not to do that. The Indian tech kept insisting that I should do it and I asked to speak with Advanced Tech support to confirm that it was indeed what I should do. They refused. Apparently it is their policy (or at least so this guy claimed) that no customer currently subjected to the FAP could speak to advanced tech support.
I was also told that I was not allowed to speak to a supervisor even though I insisted on it. I had to hang up and call to get a different techie to speak with a supervisor who claimed to be named "Elvis". Again I was denied access to advanced technical support. Even when my modem was unplugged from all computers it said I was downloading 5mb every hour for 10 hours. Although it was clear I had not downloaded the data which they claimed I had (bc of the misreporting) they claimed that there was absolutely no way to remove the FAP until the time expired. One of the common questions they would ask was "Do you have a wireless router" (prepared to tell me that perhaps someone was hijacking my internet).
They always sounded disappointed when I said "no". At that time (before they improved wireless devices) they would not work in my house. They always sounded disappointed and tried to suggest some possible reason for the large download amount. It was a constant battle and eventually they conned us into getting the next higher plan (which I think is $79 a month or so) to get a whole 425mb per day. Even with the increased limit we STILL had the miscalculating problem.
I would call when I had problems with the internet not working or being slow (they did conform that it was not working at the proper speeds for my service plan but they never did anything about it). On more than one occasion when the weather was clear the internet just went out-- I was told after three hours of being on the phone that the main satellite had "degraded" and needed to be fixed. On sunny days they claimed that "solar flares" or "wind" must have been interrupting my connection. They always blamed it on everything but themselves (except for the one time when it took me three hours to get the truth out of them). Also after reading the installation slip and measuring the height of the pole I realized that the pole was not tall enough. I called them about the issue but they assured me it wasn't a problem and refused to send someone to look at it.
When the HN7000S came out they convinced us that it would be faster and more reliable than the HN6000 so we bought it (a week before they reduced the price by $100). It seemed even less reliable than the old one and I had frequent problems with it. After a large power surge the modem seemed to have been damaged and was not working properly so we ordered a new one (we did have it in a power backup unit but it was a massive surge). The new one seemed to work better than the old one but we still had the problems with the miscalculating of bandwidth, terrible latency, and frequent outages.
Sometime between 2006-2008 the radio transmitter in the satellite finally died. It took a week to get someone to come out to look at it. Unfortunately the new transmitters would not fit the old satellite so we had to get a brand new satellite. We did finally confirm that the pole was not only incorrectly installed but it was a very flimsy cheap pole that wasn't sturdy enough and wasn't installed properly (thus it wobbled a lot when it was windy which was interrupting the signal). Apparently he was unable to get it to lock to our old satellite so he had to point it to one a few degrees to the east. Unfortunately this made the signal strength only 60.
The problems I had in the past still persist. Additionally I am getting more and more errors when I try to load pages. I get everything from DNS entry issues to TCP Acceleration errors to something about the Backbone and all manner of issues. I am completely unable to download store items for Sims3 because of the timing out problem. It does not stream downloads properly (I have seen on the Sims 3 forums that many Hughesnet users can't download Sims 3 store items and that it has to do with the way the web acceleration software is set up). If the web acceleration software stops working properly I can't get anything to load. I no longer have to static discharge my modem (I used to be required to disconnect the coaxial cables from the modem, touch the pin in the middle, then screw the cables back on). In the last year I started having a problem with the modem not sending a signal out through the ethernet port. I even plugged a computer directly in to it to test it (and used different cables). The solution seems to be to power cycle the modem manually (by unplugging it and plugging it back in after 30 seconds). Before I figured out that I needed to unplug it, I had pointless calls to tech support who tried to blame it on my cables or some other issue.
Hughesnet did extend the free period of time where people can download without it counting toward their bandwidth, but it is very slow (allegedly it is supposed to be less reliable during normal hours but I've found that starting around 6 to 8pm it gets unbearably slow and unusable of late). They apparently can cap the bandwidth usage at 0 when people are "capped" which resulted in a rather comical situation when they instituted the free uncap. I spent hours on the phone going in circles trying to explain to the guy in India that I wanted to use my free uncap but that I couldn't use it because I was unable to load the Hughesnet webpage to uncap myself. Finally he spoke to a supervisor and he used the free uncap for me.
At that point I realized that they are able to uncap people from India. At one point due to bogus download reporting (it claimed I loaded 1500mb in an hour-- which tech support agreed was physically impossible given my connection issues) so they uncapped me-- but it didn't fill the bucket back up it just turned it off so loading 1mb capped us again. My brother talked to tech support trying to get it resolved and ended up getting yelled at by the irate employee who hung up on him. One day a seemingly American tech support person gave me a callback (about the 1500mb download thing) and snootily informed me that it must be a virus that was "uploading" large amounts of data. She was very rude and refused to listen when I said it wasn't an upload and that it wasn't physically possible for it to upload OR download that much. She rudely hung up.
To their credit, Hughesnet did fix the catch 22 with the uncapping. They added software which allows users to utilize the free uncap via the modem rather than having to load the internet. They also made it so we no longer have to load a webpage to see our usage -- and we get up-to-date usage information. We now get to see bars representing our virtual bucket that tells us how much we have left and lets us monitor usage (so we know when we are getting close to our limit). The problem is, the bucket does not refill during the free period even if we don't download (which I understand in a way) and it does not refill if the modem is unplugged (or not receiving power due to power outages) or if signal is lost. So when it rained the other day and I lost signal for 3 hours my bucket did not refill at all. This means I get less than the 425mb per day bc my bucket didn't refill.
Since April we've been having even more problems with the connection. The transmitter keeps going out and our signal strength has now dropped to 40-48 (if we are lucky we get 51). I also found that the web acceleration software keeps having issues and it reports "uplink queueing" problems. It seems the bandwidth for transmission is now lower somehow (because we didn't get that problem in the past). It also keeps saying we have "excessive LAN traffic" even when only one computer is plugged in. we use Spybot Search & Destroy and Malware Bytes and monitor the usage carefully so I don't know why it is doing that. After weeks of the problems with the Web Acceleration Software (wherein the recommendation was to call technical support if the problem persisted) I called technical support. There was a rather long automated message greeting the customer and wasting time before asking questions. I discovered that if I said I was currently subjected to the FAP it would basically tell me I had to be out of the cap before I could speak with a live person-- and then it hung up on me.
Fortunately at that moment I was not subject to the FAP (even though my internet was behaving as if I was). The Indian tech seemed rather confused and did not seem to understand English well enough to understand what I was trying to tell him. He had me try to load a webpage and after about 4 minutes the page still had not loaded so I tried a different computer. I also had to unplug the router and plug the closest PC in to it. It was still unbearably slow. The tech support guy seemed confused as to why I had called. I mentioned that I had trouble downloading files and playing Facebook games. At which point he told me that the service was not intended to be used to download files or play online games. Ok, I get the online games bit-- my latency in World of Warcraft averages around 1500ms, but I'm not supposed to be downloading files? What the hell am I supposed to be using the service for then?
At one point he told me he could see there was a problem then he backed up and claimed there was nothing wrong with my system (from what he could see on his end). I told him, "tthen why is my signal strength getting progressively weaker when the sky is clear and my web acceleration software is having problems that prevent me from loading any webpages at all?" I had to reboot my modem 5 times within 30 minutes the other day to fix the web acceleration issue. Reluctantly he said he would have someone come out to my house to look at the equipment (after I explained that there were no leaves/branches blocking the satellite or any vines growing on it-- I make sure to keep it clear) but that there would be a $125 service fee and something about a credit to my account. He kept repeating it as if he expected the $125 would make me decide to cancel the service call. I'm still waiting to have the appointment scheduled.
I would not recommend Hughesnet to anyone who can avoid it. I really wish I could get AT&T wireless out here but it just isn't viable. I'm in an almost dead zone for cell service.