
Skip of Bowie, MD on Dec. 22, 2010
We have a pending legal matter that can be avoided with the proper decisions on the part of your company. In August of this year, one of their agents illegally added my son, Darren **, to my mother's policy. Darren lives in Washington, DC with his mother, and is attending Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburg, PA. More importantly, Darren has been covered under his mother's policy since he started driving. If you check the law in the District of Columbia, you will find that a person must have insurance coverage, in order to have a valid driver's license.
My mother, 80 years of age, and like many elders, is an easy target for people and organizations to steal from. In July or August, my mother informed me that your company told her that you were adding Darren to her policy, because he was driving her car. I immediately contacted your customer service department to discuss this matter. During the discussion the agent informed me that Darren needed to be added to the policy, if he drove the car at least once a week.
The agent went on to request Darren's driver's license, as well as other information to put him on the policy. I informed the agent that he was currently insured on his mother's policy, and I would stop Darren from driving my mother's car altogether. I also informed the agent that Darren is attending school in Pittsburgh, and would not even be in a position to drive the car, which is parked in Maryland. I never provided authorization, nor did I provide the information (driver's license number and state) requested by their agent to add Darren to the policy. If you review the policy you will see that they have added a fictitious person, Darren **, with no driver's license to my mother's policy.
On November 24th, I discovered that the company had deducted money from my mother's account, which they have not been authorized to do. I once again contacted your customer service number, and had a long discussion with agent Mike **, number 271964. The result of that grueling conversation, was that your underwriting department would take Darren off of the policy back to August, refunding the premiums, if I provided proof by an insurance declarations page, that Darren is currently insured by another company.
It took me a couple of days to get to declarations page, and I provided it with the requested letter on December 1. I received a call a few days later from your agent Frank ** stating he only needed to get in touch with the State Farm agent, James **, for some additional information to authorize the complete refund of the money taken out of my mother's account. Frank stated that if I did not hear from him again, everything was taken care of.
On yesterday, I once again contacted their customer service department, asking when my mother would see all of the funds deposited back into her account. I was told that the only change that has occurred is that Darren was dropped effective in November, which would not result in any money being returned. I received a call from Frank ** stating that he had left a couple of messages for the State Farm agent, but had not pursued it any further. I asked him why he had not followed up with me, and his response was an apology. After being on the phone with Frank for over forty minutes, I was told that your underwriting department has reversed the decision to refund the stolen money.
How can a company that would steal money from an eighty year old senior on fixed income, call itself reputable? I would like to have this matter immediately corrected and money returned. We will hold their company at fault if my mother has any financial issues like insufficient fund charges, related to money being stolen from her account. Without your immediate response, we will not only pursue this legally, but also plan to inform AARP, the Maryland Insurance Commission, Maryland Consumer Affairs, as well as 60 minutes.