
Lynda of Long Beach, CA on May 2, 2010
In December 2005, I purchased Viking products from the professional line to complete a remodel in my kitchen. This included a 42" refrigerator/freezer (VCSB423), a 36" stove/oven (VDSC3676) and a separate single oven (VESO107CSS). They were installed by a Viking Certified installation company Executive Appliance Services in May 2006. I have had nothing but trouble with the freezer unit and stove top. The same problems continue to occur, and the products are no longer under warranty. By August of 2006 I was forced to make my first call for repair, and eight subsequent calls have been made. The following is a list of dates and reasons for repair calls:
8/06, Ice maker working improperly/fill tube leaked, Executive Appliance Services
5/07, Ice maker working improperly/new deli service kit installed, Executive Appliance Services
7/07, Spark modules replaced on stove unit, Executive Appliance Services
9/07, Ignition wires replaced with new model on stove unit, Executive Appliance Services
12/07, New ice maker and water valve installed, Executive Appliance Services
4/09, Auger motor re-secured in ice maker, Executive Appliance Services
5/09, Burner bases and bodies replaced on stove, Sues Young and Brown
3/10, Burner bases/ ignition cleaned because of intermittent clicking, Sues Young and Brown
4/10, Ice maker checked after freezer door not sealed properly, Appliance Masters of Southern California, Inc.
Each time a repair technician was called out in 2007, a "new part" was available to fix a design flaw in the ice maker and ignition system in the stove. This tells me that Viking knew it had produced substandard products, and there were enough complaints to necessitate the development of "fixes." Due to what I consider to be Viking's excellent reputation, I allowed the continued parade of repair technicians through my kitchen to finally get what I had expected: a stove and a refrigerator/freezer that would service my family. What I have are appliances that are sucking me dry of my high school teacher's salary on a regular basis. I did not take advantage of the "Lemon Law" in California because each time repairs were made, I believed that would be the last time a technician would be needed.
I am extremely disappointed in the quality and durability of my Viking appliances. I should not have to feel cautious when cooking nor relieved when each item lasts one more month without having to make a repair call. I spent a great deal of money to have the kitchen of my dreams; one that would allow me to practice my culinary skills and look great as well. I deeply regret not researching my kitchen appliances more carefully. I now believe that I let my vanity get the better of me, and I am stuck with an intermittently functioning kitchen for many years to come. I would never consider buying another Viking appliance nor recommending it to friends and family.
Several calls have been made to Viking Headquarters in Mississippi looking for a permanent solution to the issues in my kitchen. While Charlotte ** was kind enough to give me a free repair call in March 2010 to service the stove, no acceptable solution has been reached that will prevent future problems. Although I would dearly love to replace my kitchen appliances with more reliable ones, I cannot afford to do so, nor should I have to. I would like for Viking to take care of the cost of any and all future repair calls regarding the problems that have existed in the past. I would also like to sit down face-to-face in my kitchen with the head of Viking Corporation to discuss the above repair issues.