CONSUMER NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS  


Complain about a product or service

Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish
Automotive    Education    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Shopping    Travel   
HEALTH:   Intro |  Health Clubs |  Hearing Aids |  Hospitals |  Nursing Homes |  Nutrition |  Rx |  Vision Care |  Weight Loss

"You're off base ..."



Optometrists vs. the World
Rebecca
Larry
Gene
Keith
Will
Lee
---
Readers Respond
Joe
Kim

Keith E. Watson, O.D. (9/5/03)::
I think your comments about optometry are a little off base. I agree with Rebecca; however, I would like to add to her comments.

Optometrists (ODs) and Ophthalmologists (OMDs) can easily live in the same world. We both have our jobs. ODs see more routine eye exams and OMDs see more referrals for eye disease and surgery. We refer a lot to them when we diagnose a problem that is beyond our scope of practice. They in turn refer back to us for routine exams such as refractions for glasses or contacts.

That doesn't mean our jobs don't overlap. They certainly do. But I hardly think that a little conjunctivitis warrants a $120 exam from the local retinal surgeon. That's a job for us. We are more than qualified to treat people for conditions like this. And get this: We save people money--and we save insurance companies money too! That's why more and more insurance companies are discovering that we have a place in the medical world and we can actually save them some money. OMDs charge a lot more than we do for even simple treatments like conjunctivitis. Which is why your comment that people should only visit OMDs is wrong.

We did not say, and do not contend, that consumers should "only visit OMDs." We said -- and will continue to say -- that it is "a good idea" for consumers to have at least an occasional exam by an ophthalmologists. We think the otometrists doth protest too much.

Kim of Woodlyn PA writes: (9/16/03):
Keith is incorrect on his statements about treating conjuctivitis. Most insurances will not cover going to see an optometrist for anything other than refractive work and such. If you are on the outside of your two-year visit allowable for insurance, you cannot just go see an optometrist if your eye is red, your medical insurance wants you to either see your primary care physician or an opthalmoligist.

So I am sorry to tell Keith as a patient I would much rather spend my copay of $10 or $20 to a physician, then getting denied through my medical and optical insurance and paying full price for you to exam my conjuctivitis.


Consumer News

September 6 2008

Recent Recalls & Safety Alerts



FREE CONSUMER NEWSLETTERS

The Daily Consumer
Afternoons M-F

Sign up now!


Consumer News & Alerts
Every Sunday

Sign up now!


Knowledge is free.
Knowledge is power.







Back to the top |

Advertisement


Home | Complaint Form | News | Recalls | FAQ |
Consumer Resources | Small Claims Guide | Lemon Law | Newsletter | Contact Us
Advertise With Us | Testimonials | Newsroom | RSS Feeds |


Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.    The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission.