
Tracey of Eldon, MO on May 8, 2009
Unsuccessful attempts to get our interest rates and monthly minimum payments reduced with telephone calls to the creditors prompted us to contact Credit Solutions in January 2008, for assistance in getting our accounts paid off. My husband was just getting ready to start college, and we knew that it would become harder to come up with the money to pay on cards we had quit using three months prior. Their program sounded too good to be true, the possibility of settling 13K for $6k and a fee of $1869? Who wouldn't take that opportunity to start again (without the burden of being trapped by credit card debt) if offered assistance? Being told to let our accounts go delinquent (they were only 30 days past due when we contacted CS- balances, payments, and interest rates were quite high), as it would provide better leverage for negotiating settlement of the accounts, as they could get them settled for half of what was owed somewhere between 40-60%. We followed their instructions, not to have any contact with our creditors after sending each a certified copy of Power of Attorney paperwork allowing Credit Solutions to act on our behalf, and giving the creditor line number to any creditors who continued to call; and began paying the fee and saving what we could as outlined in the Customer Enrollment package.
Sometime in June 2008, after months of voicemails and past due notices from creditors-we contacted CS, asking if there had been any settlement offers received from these creditors. The one CS representative who was good about returning calls (not as good in negotiating settlements anywhere close to the 40-60% as claimed in the Customer Enrollment Packet or early enrollment phone calls) stated that it was too soon, the accounts weren't delinquent enough, and inquired as to the amount of money we had saved at that time. It was agreed that we needed to continue saving, and wait for settlement offers to come in.
Our next call to CS was in October 2008 when I began receiving phone calls at work from a particular nasty creditor, who after identifying herself asked to verify my name and address, which I did. At that point, I informed the rep that they were not to contact me at my place of employment, and needed to call my credit advisor at CS. Days later we received correspondence from the credit representative telling us that the account had been turned over to a law office- which would be taking us to court. I immediately contacted CS, asking our rep why it had come to this, wasn't this the basis of their program helping people by negotiating settlement with our creditors in order to keep from being sued? The settlement took almost 2 weeks, as our rep told us that the creditor hadn't forwarded the Power of Attorney to the law office, so we went through that whole process again. Our rep (the only one to actually negotiate an account for less than owed, not the 40-60%) negotiated a settlement of $429, the account was only $638 when we enrolled). This prompted the flood gates to open..
We received another letter shortly after from a second creditor again informing us that the account had been turned over for court proceedings. Fortunately, we had been saving money as required, and still had a small amount left over from paying the first account, to make an initial payment to the creditor, and then had to agree to make 2 more monthly payments to get that account paid (this settlement caused hardship in paying basic monthly shelter expenses during the winter months, however did actually save a large amount of money), as we settled for $1000 less than original balance.
However, 2009 was a new year, began saving money again, and anticipating the annual tax return money in hopes of getting the other 4 accounts settled before being forced into legal action on them. Didn't last long, March 26, 2009 we were served with a subpeona from HSBC. I immediately contact CS, and continue daily leaving several voicemails for our regular rep Calvin to return my call. A week and a half later finally resigned to being placed in que to be helped by next available credit specialist.. Explained that our regular rep hadn't returned any of my calls. Spoke with new rep questioned why we were receiving a subpeona, and why it had come to this? Again, repeating the same questions asked months earlier, wasn't this why we hired CS, to avoid being sued? Had there not been any settlement offers on this account either? I was told that I would now need to deal with the litigation department, as the regular reps weren't allowed to handle my account??
Spoke with a litigation specialist named Robert, who took down the information in order to contact the law office. I inquired as to when I could expect a return call, his response was by the end of the week, if I hadn't heard back to call or email him (he gave me his extension and told me that I could also email him, as he was capable of taking calls and corresponding by email while doing so). Left a voicemail at the end of the week, and sent a email to him asking for update. Calling back the next week I dialed my original rep, Calvin's extension, asking for assistance explained that Robert was supposed to have gotten back to me. I was then transferred to Sang and explained that I was upset, again repeated my spiel regarding the whole reason why we hired CS to avoid legal action and get this stuff paid off. He apologized for Robert's lack of response, "understanding my concern" he assured me that he was very successful in his abilities to settle litigation accounts, and if I would send a copy of the subpeona over (which I promptly had scanned and emailed to him) that he would get back to me ASAP. I stated my concern about how long ASAP would be... as it seemed the calls weren't currently being returned by anyone, that I was having to take my entire hour lunch just to make contact with them lately.
Sang did return my call, however only to inform me that this particular lawyer's office would not deal with credit solutions, and I would need to call and negotiate it myself, but to call CS back and let them know what was agreed upon. This upset me a little, as I was paying them to work with the creditors, why did I have to call the law office and negotiate my account? I let Sang know that this did not please me. I tried to negotiate this account with the law office, and felt I was unsuccessful, as in order to avoid going to court, we didn't have enough left from the money saved and tax return, so had to agree to monthly payments and will end up paying $800 more than the account was when we enrolled in credit solutions. There goes the savings from the last settled account.
At this point, we were getting pretty worried, because the account with a "big balance" (a Capitol One card-the largest of the 6 accounts with a balance of $5100 when "enrolled in the program"), had yet to be settled... wondered if there would be another subpeona later in the week. It actually took 2 weeks for the next one to be served, and it was for the 'Big Balance".
The second subpoena showed up and they are now asking for $8430.27 plus interest and court costs. Contacted CS, unable to reach Sang, so have asked to speak to another litigation specialist, this time I get Tyrell, who is very regretful about the past problems, and gets an earful regarding this latest development. Together, we three way call this new law office, and are told that they were willing to settle for $4000 down and payments of $225mo at 24.90% for 24 months (more than the amount asked in the court documents-where is the 40-60% savings?) This account is the main reason why we enrolled in their program, as the other accounts would have been manageable. Another call to Tyrell a few days later to see if there is any other way to deal with this account in order to avoid going to court. He suggests the famous "can you borrow from family or friends line... " It really amazes me that they teach these reps this one, because hello!! By the time most people enroll in Credit Solutions program they have already borrowed from anywhere that they possible could have.. family, friends, loans, etc..
We ended up having to go to court on this one and are currently still in the middle of proceedings, (go back for trial on May 26th).