
Almaris of Brooklyn, NY on May 6, 2008
On 5/6/08 I returned a phone call to Wendell xt. 543015, a customer service representative, that left a message asking me to do so. Miracle Financial is a debt collection agency, once I was transferred to Wendell and he answered the phone I noticed that when Wendell was "verifying" my personal indentification information (ie social security #, address, phone number) he would say the information in its entirety and then ask me to "verify" by responding "Yes" or "No" that the information he read me was correct. I was automatically alarmed at this verification process because it was obviously violating privacy laws.
After discussing the debt that Wendell was attempting to collect, I asked him how many phone numbers he had on file for me. He read all the complete phone numbers to me (there were phone numbers of places I had never resided at) I then asked him about the verification practices of Miracle Financial. When I expressed my concerns he very sarcastically reiterated statements that I made concerning the privacy issue. I then asked to be transeferred to a supervisor he expressed that he wasn't sure why I needed to speak to someone if he and I were about to "hang-up anyway".
I was persistent and after being placed on hold a reprsentative by the name of Lisa answered saying she is his supervisor, she was extremely unhelpful and disrespectful. While speaking to Lisa I tried to express my concerns about the level of confidentiality they were demonstrating regarding the information of individuals they are attempting to collect debts from but sadly all she did was talk over me and ask me when I was going to pay the less that $200 debt in question.
I didn't ask to be transferred to anyone else but she said into the phone's receiver, "Susie what extension are you under because this girl is trippin". I was transferred to Susie who stated that she was a supervisor as well and she said the identification method used by Wendell was common practice at Miracle Financial and she deemed it appropriate to repeat personal identification information to clients in order to get them to verify that it is them.
I was immediately aware of the racial undertone that the remark made by Lisa carried, I tried to address how inappropriate it was with Susie but she didn't want to discuss anything about the (mis)behavior of her colleagues. She was yelling at me over the phone regarding the debt even when I asked her to let me speak she would not, I proceeded to hang up.
I called the Miracle Financial office's mainline (508-) and a young lady named Holly answered she said her title is Client Services Representative. I explained to her that I need to speak to a Quality Control supervisor or Collections department director. She redirected me to contact Ms. Earline W., the floor supervisor of the individuals I had spoken to. I called the 1800 # she provided and got in contact with Earline. It was obvious that she had already been notified by her colleagues. She began the conversation by trying to collect the debt I explained that I had another concern to address first.
I explained to her my concern about Miracle Financial's privacy practices, I also expressed my disapproval with the manner in which Lisa addressed me "this girl is trippin'" is gravely unacceptable in any type of professional context. I explained to her that I felt the remark had racial undertones and Earline Whithead esponded that "she doubted it had any racial meaning because Wendell, the young man that transferred the call to Lisa, was also black." I was livid I could not believe the repeated lack of professionalism and the apparent disregard of tact and not to mention the complete lack of cultural sensitivity.
I, the client, am not an African-American or "black" as Earline Whitehead stated the representative, Wendell is. So what she planned to accomplish by assuring me that Wendell is black is still unknown to me. This entire situation is alarming and I am deeply offended by the manner in which this has been handled. Ms. Earline W. made excuses for her colleagues and did not say she would change anything about the practices of the organization.