|
CONSUMER NEWS RECALLS COMPLAINT FORM SCAM ALERTS |
| Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish | |
|
|
UKI Communications / ILD Teleservices |
||||
|
UKI Communications, formerly American TeleNetwork, apparently claims to be a long-distance company at some times and a local service company at others. Most of the complaints we receive -- and there are many -- deal with "slamming," the abhorrent practice of switching customers from one long-distance carrier to another. Customers, like those below, who have been "slammed" by UKI should write to the company at this address:
We recommend sending a certified, return-receipt-requested letter outlining the disputed charges and requesting an immediate refund. A copy should be sent to the Public Utilities Commission in the consumer's state and to the Federal Communications Commission. Also involved in some UKI complaints is ILD Teleservices, a "billing clearinghouse." For more information and complaints, click here. Betty of Dyer TN (2/13/03):
David of Jacksonville AL (2/13/03):
"F" of Lorman MS (2/4/03):
Well I called them and they said we'll have to listen to the recored message. I said OK, let's set up a time, and of me authorizing them to switch my services. Well the arranged day came, and went. No call playing a recording. I got another bill saying I now owe $170.00 and some change I SAID NO WAY! I supposedly owe this company almost $400. I will get an attorney before I pay this. Alta of Huntsville AL (10/24/02):
Robert of Phenix City AL (10/12/02):
Karen of Hobart IN (10/5/02):
My parents are in ill health, my mother is on oxygen. I am the only child able to help, and I have Post Traumtic Stress Disorder (USAF Vet). There are a lot more important things to take up our time than being cheated by someone. I can't handle anymore of a load than I already have, I am already having trouble dealing with just the day-to-day things. Marjorie of W. Burlington IA (10/2/02):
Laura of Miami (9/16/02):
Lori of Stewartville MN (8/26/02):
Lourdes of Burke VA (8/21/02):
Kelly of Miami (4/9/02):
Mr. Thomas was extremely rude so I asked to talk with a supervisor to what he responded that he was the supervisor. I said that if any, I would pay the equivalent of what I would had paid if my long distance provider would have charged me, which he refused. I asked for UKI to stop the service immediately. I tried in numerous occations and at different times of the day to call UKI to try to speak with someone different from Mr. Thomas but he would always answer the telephone. I did not pay the balance owed to UKI. Michael of Auburn AL (4/8/02):
Jesus of Woodside NY (1/22/02):
After viewing my bill I immediately called the 800 number on my bill. I was then told that I would have to dial another 800 number since this was not the actual customer service line. I called and they were quite upset at my inquiry. I had told them that I refuse to pay for these charges. They played a recording of me accepting this contract and it was obviously doctored. They have a system which they sell you something and tape you in the process. They then use this as a verification tool to get their unsuspecting victims. I had told them that this was not me and I had no recollection of even being contacted by these people. I was then threatened to be handed over to the collections agency for failure to pay for these charges which are fraudulant. I was told by the supervisor, John Roa, that he would be doing me a favor and reducing the bill to the normal rate. I have a funny feeling that he will not do so. I am very angry right now. Kelsey of Ontario, Canada, writes (9/12/01) on behalf of her employer, a large multionational food company: The long distance service of one of our offices was changed without notice to us. When we contacted UKI communications to report the problem, then hung up on us. When we had our local phone provider contact them they were very rude and unwilling to be cooperative. UKI claimed that someone had authorized the service change and clamied they had a recorded tape of the conversation. They played the tape for me. The call was in Spanish and the woman "supposedly" accepting the service was a woman, when the office belongs to a man. Also, on the tape they specifically as this person to give the address of the residence. The address given does NOT match that of the address where this office resides. I asked them to remove the service and issue a credit it to us for the amount. The man on the other end of the phone was very upset and hung up on me. I do not know how long this company has been charging our company for fradulent services. We have many accounts. Ecomomic damage has been yet to be determined. Other than upsetting me, I do not have any other damage. This company is wasting my time by making me track down when and who authorized fradulent charges on our phone bill. How many other people are they doing this to? JoAnn of Berkeley had a similar experience (1/7/02):
Approximately a month before the change, a person claiming to be from my chosen long distance carrier (Working Assets) told me that they had in their records that my long distance changed, and told me the familiar deals with the company to get me back. I believed that I was signed up with my long distance carrier (Working Assets). I am still doing my personal inquiries, and continue to make the calls to my local phone provider, Working Assets, and UKI. As this incident is fairly recent for me, I cannot yet describe the consequences. It is, for certain, a nuisance. |
|||
Advertisement
|
Home |
Rogues Gallery |
Good Guys |
Complaint Form |
News |
Recalls |
Search |
Video |
FAQ |
|
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. |