|
CONSUMER NEWS RECALLS COMPLAINT FORM SCAM ALERTS |
| Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish | |
|
|
|
AUTOMOTIVE
Dealers |
Manufacturers |
Service |
Warranties |
Lemon Laws |
Recalls |
Tires |
Transporters |
Racing
|
Isuzu - Miscellaneous Problems |
|||||||
|
My 1999 Isuzu Rodeo cought fire in a parking lot at a ballpark. The Rodeo had been parked at 9:30 am and had caught fire at 2:30 pm. After investigation by the insurance company, it was determined without a doubt that the Cruise Control Module, located under the center console, had failed. The Cruise Control Module caught fire along with the associated wiring harness and burned the majority of the front interior of the Rodeo. The fire smoldered out due to lack of oxygen because the windows were up and no ventilation was available. When I contacted American Isuzu Motor Corp. to let them know about the Cruise Control Module failure and that it had spontaneously caught the Rodeo on fire, I was told by the representative that there was nothing I could do because the part was no longer under warranty. I asked if Isuzu was interested in at least an investigation, he said no. David of Irvine CA (4/10/03):
The car has just over 32,000 miles on the odometer and we took the vehicle into the dealer were we purchased it and immediately were told that the glass would not be covered by the warranty. I had told the technician that the glass clearly was faulty and under normal operating conditions, rear windows don’t just explode out. I read the warranty manual and could not find were the manual excludes glass from being a warrantable item and could not find it. I left several messages with customer service, and when they finally got back to me, they told me to make a claim with my auto insurance carrier. During the phone conversation, I was given every excuse why they would not repair the window. At one point I was told that the window must have been shot out with a pellet gun.The window cost of replacement is $526.00 This is a fairly standard occurrence which is almost always covered by insurance. It's not worth fighting about. Mark of Grapevine, TX (10/3/02):
Nick of Jacksonville, FL (9/28/02):
On July 3, 2002 Mr. Downing took pictures of the rust spots and that was the last time we've heard from him. Mr. Haskin had us take the vehicle for repair estimates on the vehicle. On Aug. 1, 2002 Sharon talked to dealership's Gen. Mgr. and she informed him that we bought a new car but didn't want a rust bucket and she asked him if he was in our shoes would he buy it? He replied NO! Sharon told him that we want another vehicle, no more no less. To this day, we haven't heard from him either. The vehicle has not been repaired either. We paid almost $25,000.00 for this rust bucket? I am damn mad that these people had not made any effort to right a wrong. I executed my end of the bargain/contract to pay for it. It's their turn to give me a new vehicle without any rust! If Nick thinks Isuzu will do this voluntarily, he is naive. He should consult an experienced trial attorney immediately. Larry of Magalia, CA (2/21/02):
I think it should be disclosed to the consumer where all parts are made, right down to the wiper blades and hoses, even if the list is three pages long. To top it off, they charge $135.00 for a replacement actuator that, in my book isn't worth the plastic and tin it's made of. Please let me know how they get away with this deceiving practice. I now have two door lock actuators that don't work and the other two ocasionally stick. I don't plan on replacing junk with overpriced junk, but if I did, it would cost $135.00 x 4 =$540.00 for about $4.00 worth of Taiwan made garbage. I don't expect compensation for this. I'm just frustrated and want to voice my opinion as an American consumer. So-called "manufacturers" are really assemblers. They would buy parts made on Jupiter if they were cheaper than those from China. Mark of San Jose, CA (12/7/01):
Well I went to 4 body shops and I was told that car left factory with a faulty paint.Somehow the paint reacts with primer under the clearcoat and develops whiteish milky spots. Car needs a full paint job because each part of the chassis has a different stage of paint detoration. After the second "look" by Mr. Chambers and after 2 letters and 3 months of waiting finaly I got a fax from Isuzu. Isuzu wrote they are offerring me $1000 for a paint job. I can not accept that -- the car is only 3 years old and probably in next year or two paint will come off by itself. Resale value of the car dropped, appearance of the car went down. I have opened already a case in Small Claim Court to either get a car painted by American Isuzu Motor Corp. or get reimbursed for a paint job $5,000. Mark is doing the right thing. Small Claims is the right place for disputes of this kind. Good luck to him. Report Your Experience
|
||||||
Back to the top | Automotive |
|||||||
Advertisement
|
Home |
Rogues Gallery |
Good Guys |
Complaint Form |
News |
Recalls |
Search |
Site Map |
FAQ |
|
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. |
|