
Christopher of Los Angeles, CA on May 1, 2009
I am outraged at the tactics of your company. They are not just personally reprehensible, they are tortious. You yourself have supplied me with all the written, verifiable proof I need to continue my claim.
...(edited for length)
If there was not a mistake made and this was not a misunderstanding, then this was outright malicious deception on behalf of Sunrise Ford.
It was very clear that we had negotiated an all-encompassing deal for the purchase. You and I had offer, counteroffer, and mutual consent. All of this is in writing and easily verified. I strongly suggest you show the responsibility and review the dialogue. It is written, exists in both our possessions, verifiable and will be subpoenaed.
As a courtesy, here is an abbreviated timeline:
1) I visited your showroom on April 22nd at about 5:45 pm to test drive an Edge Limited.
2) I supplied all relevant information at that meeting. What Sunrise Ford did with it is not my responsibility. I was offered $19,000 for my 2006 Prius as a trade in. There was an incentive of potentially getting $20,000 for the car (the $20,000 figure needed approval) if I made the deal that night. The net purchase price was given as $31,415. I have the VIN/deal sheet in my possession and the writing with the offers are in your handwriting. I was told the Edge has been on the lot for 102 days and they were eager to deal.
3) At 4:24 AM on April 23rd, I sent an email to Christopher G
detailing my offer on the car...I was clear that I would be there immediately if the terms were accepted.
4) The afternoon of April 24th, approximately 1:20 pm, Christopher G called me and said that he had given my email to his sales manager, and the counteroffer was the SAME deal, only a 30K net price, which meant I would finance approximately $8000. I told him I would have to think about over the weekend. But make no mistake, these were the all-encompassing terms, and not only that the counteroffer was YOUR invention.
5) In addition to that phone call, I have a series of texts from that afternoon from Sunrise Ford reiterating the terms of the deal. There were no contingencies and no ambiguities. ...
6) The April 27th through April 30th was a series of texts, none of which modified the deal. I was mulling the deal and Sunrise Ford repeatedly let it be known the offer was still in effect. ... Sunrise, again in writing, said it was ok.
7) The afternoon of April 30th I made one slight modification to the deal: I thought I had an extra set of HOV stickers, and I did not. I informed Sunrise of this at 2:20 pm and informed I would be coming in to purchase as soon as I got away from work - the deal was accepted with no caveats or modifications from Sunrise.
8) Once I arrived, I got a runaround. First I was presented a different car than what we were discussing...
9) At this point, Sunrise Ford chose to ignore the deal they had offered and consented to in writing. I was prepared for the standard closing sales patter of worthless services like fabric protection and window etching, neither of which I wanted and according to writing on deal sheet, is an optional service that can be taken off at closing. What I was not prepared for was Sunrise reneging on the entire deal and trying to re-present their already WRITTEN and ACCEPTED package offer.
I am not making this up, there is no hyperbole. The deal points, offers and agreement exist in easily traceable email and SMS text messages. I strongly suggest you review and not delete the ones in your possession so we can compare.